Spider804 •03/03/2015 05:17 AM (UTC) •
0
Sensibility_has_spoken Wrote:
What the hell?!
The instigator ( as well as pro cohorts) of such inappropriate rhetoric should sit in a corner and contemplate his post.
This is MORTAL KOMBAT! Not 'Handbags At Twenty Paces Kombat'! What on earth are you thinking posting such a ludicrous thread?
No wonder my fellow board member greet such a thread with such callow reply.
I ask the moderators to close down this immediately.
What the hell?!
The instigator ( as well as pro cohorts) of such inappropriate rhetoric should sit in a corner and contemplate his post.
This is MORTAL KOMBAT! Not 'Handbags At Twenty Paces Kombat'! What on earth are you thinking posting such a ludicrous thread?
No wonder my fellow board member greet such a thread with such callow reply.
I ask the moderators to close down this immediately.
*smacks*
Sensibility_has_spoken •03/03/2015 05:19 AM (UTC) •
0
CassiesPatentedNutBuster Wrote:
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
Such commentary is inappropriate. I feel embarrassed for you holding such foolish sentiments.
Thatoneguy •03/03/2015 05:20 AM (UTC) •
About Me
0
Sensibility_has_spoken Wrote:
Such commentary is inappropriate. I feel embarrassed for you holding such foolish sentiments.
CassiesPatentedNutBuster Wrote:
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
Such commentary is inappropriate. I feel embarrassed for you holding such foolish sentiments.
This is the most obvious troll since my ex-girlfriend....
Back and sassier than before. •03/03/2015 05:20 AM (UTC) •
0
Rockchalk5477 Wrote:
...
Sub-Zero - "Takahashi Takeda. Jacqueline Briggs. Kung Jin. You are not welcome here... Especially you, Jacqui."
CassiesPatentedNutBuster Wrote:
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
...
Sub-Zero - "Takahashi Takeda. Jacqueline Briggs. Kung Jin. You are not welcome here... Especially you, Jacqui."
That sounds more racist than anything lol
Rockchalk5477 •03/03/2015 05:22 AM (UTC) •
0
Ion3008 Wrote:
That sounds more racist than anything lol
That sounds more racist than anything lol
Hahaha. That's not what I was going for, but it could be perceived that way.
Maybe Subz is casually racist and gay...?
CassiesPatentedNutBuster •03/03/2015 05:22 AM (UTC) •
0
SwingBatta Wrote:
I'm sure NRS has wanted to do that at least once at some point, but they aren't willing to open up a completely new can of worms, though.
Keep in mind that the MK fanbase goes completely apeshit over everything. This would be no exception.
CassiesPatentedNutBuster Wrote:
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-handed comment.
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-handed comment.
I'm sure NRS has wanted to do that at least once at some point, but they aren't willing to open up a completely new can of worms, though.
Keep in mind that the MK fanbase goes completely apeshit over everything. This would be no exception.
In this day and age? Please. That backlash would be reduced to a mere whimper by all the praise they get for being so 'progressively kick-ass' or some other stupid bullshit like that.
Spider804 •03/03/2015 05:23 AM (UTC) •
0
Ion3008 Wrote:
That sounds more racist than anything lol
Rockchalk5477 Wrote:
...
Sub-Zero - "Takahashi Takeda. Jacqueline Briggs. Kung Jin. You are not welcome here... Especially you, Jacqui."
CassiesPatentedNutBuster Wrote:
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
...
Sub-Zero - "Takahashi Takeda. Jacqueline Briggs. Kung Jin. You are not welcome here... Especially you, Jacqui."
That sounds more racist than anything lol
All I know is that I couldn't stop laughing after reading, lol
Sensibility_has_spoken •03/03/2015 05:23 AM (UTC) •
0
Thatoneguy Wrote:
This is the most obvious troll since my ex-girlfriend....
Sensibility_has_spoken Wrote:
Such commentary is inappropriate. I feel embarrassed for you holding such foolish sentiments.
CassiesPatentedNutBuster Wrote:
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
Such commentary is inappropriate. I feel embarrassed for you holding such foolish sentiments.
This is the most obvious troll since my ex-girlfriend....
You had a girlfriend? I can tell you're very masculine...
CassiesPatentedNutBuster •03/03/2015 05:24 AM (UTC) •
0
Rockchalk5477 Wrote:
...
Sub-Zero - "Takahashi Takeda. Jacqueline Briggs. Kung Jin. You are not welcome here... Especially you, Jacqui."
CassiesPatentedNutBuster Wrote:
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
If sexuality really has no bearing on the storyline, then I don't see why you couldn't just have a character casually reveal they're gay via an off-hand comment.
...
Sub-Zero - "Takahashi Takeda. Jacqueline Briggs. Kung Jin. You are not welcome here... Especially you, Jacqui."
I...
Okay, touche.
Spider804 •03/03/2015 05:28 AM (UTC) •
0
Rockchalk5477 Wrote:
Hahaha. That's not what I was going for, but it could be perceived that way.
Maybe Subz is casually racist and gay...?
Ion3008 Wrote:
That sounds more racist than anything lol
That sounds more racist than anything lol
Hahaha. That's not what I was going for, but it could be perceived that way.
Maybe Subz is casually racist and gay...?
Now we know why Cyrax REALLY ditched the Lin Kuei early in MK9
Murcielago •03/03/2015 05:31 AM (UTC) •
About Me
Get that ass BANNED
0
dang lmfao
Rockchalk5477 •03/03/2015 05:32 AM (UTC) •
0
Spider804 Wrote:
Now we know why Cyrax REALLY ditched the Lin Kuei early in MK9
Rockchalk5477 Wrote:
Maybe Subz is casually racist and gay...?
Maybe Subz is casually racist and gay...?
Now we know why Cyrax REALLY ditched the Lin Kuei early in MK9
See?
You've really got to do some critical thinking to appreciate all the fine inner workings of the characters and plot.
smokeman14 Wrote: 4 pages for this click bait, guys? Jesus
To be fair, at least 1/3 of it was Reptile/Johnny Cage dialogue.
predac0n •03/03/2015 05:34 AM (UTC) •
0
casual racism is fucking hilarious just saying...
Darkhound74 •03/03/2015 05:34 AM (UTC) •
About Me
0
Rockchalk5477 Wrote:
See?
You've really got to do some critical thinking to appreciate all the fine inner workings of the characters and plot.
Spider804 Wrote:
Now we know why Cyrax REALLY ditched the Lin Kuei early in MK9
Rockchalk5477 Wrote:
Maybe Subz is casually racist and gay...?
Maybe Subz is casually racist and gay...?
Now we know why Cyrax REALLY ditched the Lin Kuei early in MK9
See?
You've really got to do some critical thinking to appreciate all the fine inner workings of the characters and plot.
"Regain his humanity" my ass!!!
smokeman14 •03/03/2015 05:34 AM (UTC) •
0
4 pages for this click bait, guys? Jesus
CassiesPatentedNutBuster •03/03/2015 05:36 AM (UTC) •
0
smokeman14 Wrote:
4 pages for this click bait, guys? Jesus
4 pages for this click bait, guys? Jesus
A good bit of it is just people shooting the shit, to be fair.
predac0n •03/03/2015 05:42 AM (UTC) •
0
smokeman14 Wrote:
4 pages for this click bait, guys? Jesus
4 pages for this click bait, guys? Jesus
I feel like this topic or something similar comes up at least once a month.
We're all immune to it and tired of it in general, It's been derailed on purpose at this point.
But i'm proud of MKO today we kept the derailment civilized.
Spider804 •03/03/2015 05:51 AM (UTC) •
0
Reptile_896 Wrote:
I feel like this topic or something similar comes up at least once a month.
We're all immune to it and tired of it in general, It's been derailed on purpose at this point.
But i'm proud of MKO today we kept the derailment civilized.
smokeman14 Wrote:
4 pages for this click bait, guys? Jesus
4 pages for this click bait, guys? Jesus
I feel like this topic or something similar comes up at least once a month.
We're all immune to it and tired of it in general, It's been derailed on purpose at this point.
But i'm proud of MKO today we kept the derailment civilized.
INDEED! EVERYONE HAVE CAKE TO CELEBRATE!!!
umbrascitor •03/03/2015 05:51 AM (UTC) •
About Me
Never shake hands with a man who wears his heart on his sleeve.
0
MK9 Smoke had a certain vibe that made a lot of people think he was gay, without him ever coming right out and saying anything. Some people hated him for various reasons, but he proved to be fairly popular overall. That's a step in the right direction, I think.
If they did make a character who was clearly gay or bi, they'd have to do it carefully. If it's too obvious they're just doing it for the diversity, then it's a contrived effort that loses its meaning.
It's somewhat paradoxical, but the best way to draw positive attention to a minority position is to carry on like everything is normal instead of drawing attention to it. In real life this translates to, "If you want to be treated the same, stop rubbing it in people's faces how separate and different you are." In media, that means seamlessly integrating characters who can easily be interpreted as gay, but never saying anything about it, so that the character is cool on its own merits and their sexuality becomes cool by association. Characters like Smoke, and to some extent Rain, do that pretty well. So do games that let you choose your protagonist's sexuality as an inconsequential background option, like Mass Effect and Fable.
P.S. -- There really is nothing wrong with having discussions like these. Part of the reason I think this thread is succeeding better than the others is that the opening post seems a little more like a person is inviting a reasonable discussion, and a little less like a political antagonizer or someone who wants to add tacky elements to the game that would do far more harm than good. It's fairly civil in here, and that's why this is the first such thread I've bothered to participate in.
I applaud this thread.
If they did make a character who was clearly gay or bi, they'd have to do it carefully. If it's too obvious they're just doing it for the diversity, then it's a contrived effort that loses its meaning.
It's somewhat paradoxical, but the best way to draw positive attention to a minority position is to carry on like everything is normal instead of drawing attention to it. In real life this translates to, "If you want to be treated the same, stop rubbing it in people's faces how separate and different you are." In media, that means seamlessly integrating characters who can easily be interpreted as gay, but never saying anything about it, so that the character is cool on its own merits and their sexuality becomes cool by association. Characters like Smoke, and to some extent Rain, do that pretty well. So do games that let you choose your protagonist's sexuality as an inconsequential background option, like Mass Effect and Fable.
P.S. -- There really is nothing wrong with having discussions like these. Part of the reason I think this thread is succeeding better than the others is that the opening post seems a little more like a person is inviting a reasonable discussion, and a little less like a political antagonizer or someone who wants to add tacky elements to the game that would do far more harm than good. It's fairly civil in here, and that's why this is the first such thread I've bothered to participate in.
I applaud this thread.
Sensibility_has_spoken •03/03/2015 06:00 AM (UTC) •
0
umbrascitor Wrote:
MK9 Smoke had a certain vibe that made a lot of people think he was gay, without him ever coming right out and saying anything. Some people hated him for various reasons, but he proved to be fairly popular overall. That's a step in the right direction, I think.
If they did make a character who was clearly gay or bi, they'd have to do it carefully. If it's too obvious they're just doing it for the diversity, then it's a contrived effort that loses its meaning.
It's somewhat paradoxical, but the best way to draw positive attention to a minority position is to carry on like everything is normal instead of drawing attention to it. In real life this translates to, "If you want to be treated the same, stop rubbing it in people's faces how separate and different you are." In media, that means seamlessly integrating characters who can easily be interpreted as gay, but never saying anything about it, so that the character is cool on its own merits and their sexuality becomes cool by association. Characters like Smoke, and to some extent Rain, do that pretty well. So do games that let you choose your protagonist's sexuality as an inconsequential background option, like Mass Effect and Fable.
MK9 Smoke had a certain vibe that made a lot of people think he was gay, without him ever coming right out and saying anything. Some people hated him for various reasons, but he proved to be fairly popular overall. That's a step in the right direction, I think.
If they did make a character who was clearly gay or bi, they'd have to do it carefully. If it's too obvious they're just doing it for the diversity, then it's a contrived effort that loses its meaning.
It's somewhat paradoxical, but the best way to draw positive attention to a minority position is to carry on like everything is normal instead of drawing attention to it. In real life this translates to, "If you want to be treated the same, stop rubbing it in people's faces how separate and different you are." In media, that means seamlessly integrating characters who can easily be interpreted as gay, but never saying anything about it, so that the character is cool on its own merits and their sexuality becomes cool by association. Characters like Smoke, and to some extent Rain, do that pretty well. So do games that let you choose your protagonist's sexuality as an inconsequential background option, like Mass Effect and Fable.
Shame on you. What a deplorable thought.
CassiesPatentedNutBuster •03/03/2015 06:06 AM (UTC) •
0
Big username to actual sensibility ratio...
Sensibility_has_spoken •03/03/2015 06:12 AM (UTC) •
0
CassiesPatentedNutBuster Wrote:
Big username to actual sensibility ratio...
Big username to actual sensibility ratio...
I think you need a gf.
predac0n •03/03/2015 06:12 AM (UTC) •
0
There is nothing wrong with having this type of discussion whatsoever, but this often?
Nah man that shit grows tiresome real fast, as it's been stated before
diversity for the sake of diversity falls flat and seems forced. Has a characters
sexual orientation been relevant in MK before? Absolutely not so why start now?
When in the end it would do more harm than good. The more you force your views upon others the less we want to hear about it.
Nah man that shit grows tiresome real fast, as it's been stated before
diversity for the sake of diversity falls flat and seems forced. Has a characters
sexual orientation been relevant in MK before? Absolutely not so why start now?
When in the end it would do more harm than good. The more you force your views upon others the less we want to hear about it.
Sensibility_has_spoken •03/03/2015 06:14 AM (UTC) •
0
Reptile_896 Wrote:
There is nothing wrong with having this type of discussion whatsoever, but this often?
Nah man that shit grows tiresome real fast, as it's been stated before diversity of
the sake of diversity falls flat and seems forced. Has a characters sexual
orientation been relevant in MK before? Absolutely not so why start now?
When in the end it would do more harm than good. The more you force your views upon others the less we want to hear about it.
There is nothing wrong with having this type of discussion whatsoever, but this often?
Nah man that shit grows tiresome real fast, as it's been stated before diversity of
the sake of diversity falls flat and seems forced. Has a characters sexual
orientation been relevant in MK before? Absolutely not so why start now?
When in the end it would do more harm than good. The more you force your views upon others the less we want to hear about it.
You're wrong. Such a discussion has no place here.
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.