DVorah Wrote:


What?!!! So you want people to be stupid, fat, ugly and poor so then you will be superior to them? You have basically belittled yourself saying that others have to be stupid, fat, ugly and poor to be worse then you. That is insane. You have the biggest inferiority complex I have known.

No, I do not believe that you pride yourself with your opinions. You do it to annoy people so that they will give you attention. It is a facade. It is so transparent that everyone can see right through it. It is so bizarre that it is almost hysterically funny just like what you wrote about liking Sonya and now.

diirecthit Wrote:


I agree, why are some members saying the stale, underdeveloped characters like Mileena or Reptile or Baraka deserve to be in over MK1 characters due to the MK1 characters being underdeveloped, when they're JUST as underdeveloped as MK1 chars?

mkmileena Wrote:


Can you not read? Because the MK1 characters have had the most game opportunities and are the story focal point characters each game.




No one is complaining that MK2 characters should have been placed in MK1.
Discussion is about the characters from MK1 and their highlighted roles throughout the series being shoved down our throats while repeating the same predictable appearance and story arcs.
The only reason MK2 is being brought into this is due to people (you) trying to deflect the situation upon the other characters of the series where the circumstances ARE NOT the same.

diirecthit Wrote:


You're still wrong, since characters like Kitana, and Jax, have had the same or more playable appearances than Kano, Sonya, and Cage.

And even when they hype and promo characters like Mileena like there's no tomorrow, people still don't play her much, hence her low popularity in MK9.

projectzero00 Wrote:


Um did you see me mention the word "evolved" for Reptile or Mileena specifically? Most of the evil characters in the game will hardly ever evolve coz their job so far has been to be the villain that you have to fight against. MK9 proved that. They have hardly left room for evolving their evil characters, except for maybe the ones that have turned good like Cyrax, Ermac, Smoke, Kuai Liang, etc.
Plus whether a character's story is interesting or not is based on one's personal taste. I believe I placed emphasis on the fact that "I" personally think that Mileena, Reptile, Kung Lao, Kitana, Kuai Liang are more interesting than Sonya, Liu Kang, Cage or Kano. Amazing that someone prefers a character with a tragic story to a hero that wins everything or a chick that has been chasing a guy for 10 years right? -.-'

mkmileena Wrote:


Kitana is the only post MK1 character that should be held to MK1 standards due to her having her own stand alone, protagonist story in MK2. Jax I hold to less standards due to him being a backup role to Sonya. (Same with Kung Lao).

Your 'Mileena' comment has zero to due with the topic. Keep deflecting tho.

diirecthit Wrote:
Not only is Jax not a backup role to Sonya, since they work together, and, i believe, Jax has been in more games (MK2, MK3, MK4, MKDA, MKD(U), MKA, MKDC & MK9 vs Sonya's MK, MK3, MK4, MKDA, MKA, MKDC, MK9) but you're also completely missing my point.

What i'm saying is that NRS hold the MK1 characters to higher standards because, not only they're recognizable (like Mileena), but people also play them a lot (unlike Mileena, according to MK9's official stats). Drag me though.

diirecthit Wrote:
You're saying the MK1 cast is held to higher standards than the rest of the characters, but why have Jax, and Kitana been in more MKs than Kano, Sonya, and Cage? They've been in MK2, 3, 4(G), DA, D(U), A, DC & 9.

Jaded-Raven Wrote:
MK Unchained is to MKD what UMK3 is to MK3, and MK Gold is to MK4. Just an updated version. Not a stand-alone game.

mkmileena Wrote:


Not even that. At least the characters in UMK3 and MKG received new models, updated costumes, etc.

Jaded-Raven Wrote:


Well, the characters in MKDA through MKA were reused character models.

mkmileena Wrote:



I know that. I'm only speaking in terms three games you mentioned.
(MKA also had revamped MK4 characters, new characters, etc)

RedSumac Wrote:
Mileena in MK9 was hit by having awful gameplay. If she had gameplay as fun and accessible as Kitana, it would have been an entirely different picture.

mkmileena Wrote:
I was going to reply and fact prove everything you said here wrong, but your post is SO FUCKING stupid and inaccurate, I don't want to get worked up about such out of context, foolish accusations and make this a Mileena topic.

#icant

diirecthit Wrote:


Kitana was the worst character in MKDA, str8 up bottom tier. Why was she still popular at the time?

diirecthit Wrote:
Kitana was the worst character in MKDA, str8 up bottom tier. Why was she still popular at the time?

Jaded-Raven Wrote:


I loved Kitana in MKDA. She was my main.

Tiers aren't everything.

RedSumac Wrote:
Besides, I don't see what was wrong with her gameplay. She was awesome in MKDA. One of my best characters.
On the other hand I don't give a single fuck about tourney snobs and their opinions, outside of promoting the game through word of mouth.

diirecthit Wrote:


I didn't bring up tiers. You tried it.

RazorsEdge701 Wrote:


If you can chill out with the irrational anger, I'd actually really like to hear what your counterargument would've been. Perhaps in a PM since you don't want to derail the thread?