About Me
I feel so alone, gonna end up a Big ole pile of them bones.
0
well one thing im happy about is that scorpion owned sub-zero in thats scene but when kratos came i got turned off 
o.O
0
About Me
0
About Me
0
It will look like this but with MK in the artwork and Kratos instead of The Joker.
0
About Me
0
About Me
0
About Me
0
0
About Me
0
About Me
0
About Me
0
RubberChickenMan Wrote:
He is NOT in story mode. Seriously he is just an extra character taking no one's place.
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Your SCIV argument about The Apprentice is completely invalid. We aren't saying that he can't handle his own but that there is no point of putting him in if he would have a story completely unrelated. He won't tie in at all especially since it is a retelling of the events.
MINION Wrote:
I really dislike this argument people are having about Kratos ruining MK. The Apprentice aka. Starkiller fit in Nicely in SCIV, There was no Balance Issues aside Yoda being to small to hit most of the time. But Kratos is just as Bloodhungry as any MK Character. Hell he Ripped off Helios Head and walked around with it w/o a care in the world. Let it be known if Kratos wanted to he'd merc the F**k out of Shao Kahn. Guareenteed! He's as ruthless if not more in the world he lives. He fits perfectly.
I really dislike this argument people are having about Kratos ruining MK. The Apprentice aka. Starkiller fit in Nicely in SCIV, There was no Balance Issues aside Yoda being to small to hit most of the time. But Kratos is just as Bloodhungry as any MK Character. Hell he Ripped off Helios Head and walked around with it w/o a care in the world. Let it be known if Kratos wanted to he'd merc the F**k out of Shao Kahn. Guareenteed! He's as ruthless if not more in the world he lives. He fits perfectly.
Your SCIV argument about The Apprentice is completely invalid. We aren't saying that he can't handle his own but that there is no point of putting him in if he would have a story completely unrelated. He won't tie in at all especially since it is a retelling of the events.
He is NOT in story mode. Seriously he is just an extra character taking no one's place.
Thank you! Someone who actually gets it. The backlash on this is Futile. But I'm glad someone recognizes this as well. He's only there to draw in fans of the character who want to enjoy MK and a character from another brand as well. I see no harm in favoring the fans. I'm satisfied.
MINION Wrote:
Thank you! Someone who actually gets it. The backlash on this is Futile. But I'm glad someone recognizes this as well. He's only there to draw in fans of the character who want to enjoy MK and a character from another brand as well. I see no harm in favoring the fans. I'm satisfied.
I seriously don't think many God of War fans will buy this game just to kill people with Kratos. I mean it's pretty redundantThank you! Someone who actually gets it. The backlash on this is Futile. But I'm glad someone recognizes this as well. He's only there to draw in fans of the character who want to enjoy MK and a character from another brand as well. I see no harm in favoring the fans. I'm satisfied.
0
GodlyShinnok Wrote:
It will look like this but with MK in the artwork and Kratos instead of The Joker.
It will look like this but with MK in the artwork and Kratos instead of The Joker.
I REALLY hope so, i don't want Kratos on the Damn Cover too
About Me
0
MINION Wrote:
Thank you! Someone who actually gets it. The backlash on this is Futile. But I'm glad someone recognizes this as well. He's only there to draw in fans of the character who want to enjoy MK and a character from another brand as well. I see no harm in favoring the fans. I'm satisfied.
RubberChickenMan Wrote:
He is NOT in story mode. Seriously he is just an extra character taking no one's place.
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Your SCIV argument about The Apprentice is completely invalid. We aren't saying that he can't handle his own but that there is no point of putting him in if he would have a story completely unrelated. He won't tie in at all especially since it is a retelling of the events.
MINION Wrote:
I really dislike this argument people are having about Kratos ruining MK. The Apprentice aka. Starkiller fit in Nicely in SCIV, There was no Balance Issues aside Yoda being to small to hit most of the time. But Kratos is just as Bloodhungry as any MK Character. Hell he Ripped off Helios Head and walked around with it w/o a care in the world. Let it be known if Kratos wanted to he'd merc the F**k out of Shao Kahn. Guareenteed! He's as ruthless if not more in the world he lives. He fits perfectly.
I really dislike this argument people are having about Kratos ruining MK. The Apprentice aka. Starkiller fit in Nicely in SCIV, There was no Balance Issues aside Yoda being to small to hit most of the time. But Kratos is just as Bloodhungry as any MK Character. Hell he Ripped off Helios Head and walked around with it w/o a care in the world. Let it be known if Kratos wanted to he'd merc the F**k out of Shao Kahn. Guareenteed! He's as ruthless if not more in the world he lives. He fits perfectly.
Your SCIV argument about The Apprentice is completely invalid. We aren't saying that he can't handle his own but that there is no point of putting him in if he would have a story completely unrelated. He won't tie in at all especially since it is a retelling of the events.
He is NOT in story mode. Seriously he is just an extra character taking no one's place.
Thank you! Someone who actually gets it. The backlash on this is Futile. But I'm glad someone recognizes this as well. He's only there to draw in fans of the character who want to enjoy MK and a character from another brand as well. I see no harm in favoring the fans. I'm satisfied.
They could have just made a poster of Kratos in a business suit holding a copy of this game and smiling, and the retarded PS3 community would have bought the game AND not have had to waste time playing as/ playing against people who think guest characters are cool, when they are honestly just a waste of time.
Before you go off on me saying that I don't like PS3 and all this and I only like Xbox, no..... I have a PS3 and I tend to play it somewhat often. Yes there are games I would rather play on my Xbox due to the fact that the online is better (we pay for better online). but I still use it especially to play MK2 so yea.
About Me
0
MINION Wrote:
Look first and foremost man, I want to point out I don't have nothing against you. I hope we can be friends down the line. But on subject, I have nothing against you or anyone else here who have opinions on this game and characters. I do respect and admire as well as take into consideration what has been stated from both sides of the clause being happy or disappointed. I do think Sweet Tooth would of been alright for MK he's just as ruthless no doubt. But the fact that Sweet Tooth is a clown and a badass one at that. He wouldn't fit due to the lack of Fighting Experience. Kratos is similar to Kahn in that he fights, fights, kills, etc. Needles he just kills and drives around. He has no real experience in anything outside of Knives and Guns to my degree. Just saying Kratos is more built to fight in an MK environment due to the Countless battles he's had with many of the gods and what not.
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
Maybe it was because there weren't many cross overs that they could have put an ice cream truck driver in considering in all of his appearances he was bound to the truck until that mode in the TMHO remake came out where you could run around as Sweet Tooth. Sweet Tooth (as seen through cut scenes, especially TMB) is much more brutal than Kratos. If they didn't think that Quan Chi was enough of a Clown that they didn't need Sweet Tooth maybe we could have a good character as opposed to Quan Chi's sissy Twin Brother that apparently most of the people who are true MK fans are mad about because they don't want guest characters to begin with because MK Vs DC turned out to be absolutely terrible. Now I agree with no guest characters but if they had to put someone in why couldn't they have at least made it someone mildly cool?
MINION Wrote:
Thanks for reading between the lines. I simply stated "Jaffe" never allowed it. That was Twisted Metal 3 aka 989 Studios Sweet Tooth version when they had the license. So yes, Yawn more please.
TheNinjasRock071394 Wrote:
*Yawn* even though it isn't a fighter, just to prove you wrong, I am going to be the guy to point out to you that Sweet Tooth was in Hot Shots Golf 2 for the Play Station
MINION Wrote:
Obviously? I knew this. I'm not saying Kratos was meant to be a MK character. I'm saying he fits in the Universe due to how ruthless he is. Bloodshed is something GoW strives on as does MK with it's Fatality's, Blood & Gore. I could not see a more fitting Guest character. Do I think he should be in every MK game after this one? NO, That would be a selfish state of mind because obvious Kratos belongs to 1 world in which he lives. But for a Guest character it's a perfect opportunity to Strech the character passed Greek Mythology and open up his presence in a new form of Development. It's obvious Jaffe felt strongly about him fitting in thus why he is. Jaffe isn't an easy guy when it comes to his Franchises. We never seen Sweet Tooth in anything outside of Twisted Metal so to see Kratos in MK say's a lot. Granted he was in Soul Calibur. That I can say was not needed, much like Link in SC. I can agree those choices for that game were Ludicrious. But with a Game like MK as violent as it's going to be, I see much enjoyment.
RazorsEdge701 Wrote:
Stryker was made to be an MK character. He literally exists in the MK universe.
Kratos is from a different franchise. No matter how similar in aesthetic that franchise ever gets to MK, it's still NOT MK, it's a DIFFERENT FRANCHISE.
MINION Wrote:
RazorsEdge701 Wrote:
MINION, just because something has things in common with MK does not mean it belongs in MK.
I disagree. Because this is the notion that was thrown around with Stryker. I'm sorry I'm not as Narrow minded, and actually give things a chance. I guess this is one of the reason I have a high tolerance for negativity.MINION, just because something has things in common with MK does not mean it belongs in MK.
Stryker was made to be an MK character. He literally exists in the MK universe.
Kratos is from a different franchise. No matter how similar in aesthetic that franchise ever gets to MK, it's still NOT MK, it's a DIFFERENT FRANCHISE.
Obviously? I knew this. I'm not saying Kratos was meant to be a MK character. I'm saying he fits in the Universe due to how ruthless he is. Bloodshed is something GoW strives on as does MK with it's Fatality's, Blood & Gore. I could not see a more fitting Guest character. Do I think he should be in every MK game after this one? NO, That would be a selfish state of mind because obvious Kratos belongs to 1 world in which he lives. But for a Guest character it's a perfect opportunity to Strech the character passed Greek Mythology and open up his presence in a new form of Development. It's obvious Jaffe felt strongly about him fitting in thus why he is. Jaffe isn't an easy guy when it comes to his Franchises. We never seen Sweet Tooth in anything outside of Twisted Metal so to see Kratos in MK say's a lot. Granted he was in Soul Calibur. That I can say was not needed, much like Link in SC. I can agree those choices for that game were Ludicrious. But with a Game like MK as violent as it's going to be, I see much enjoyment.
*Yawn* even though it isn't a fighter, just to prove you wrong, I am going to be the guy to point out to you that Sweet Tooth was in Hot Shots Golf 2 for the Play Station
Thanks for reading between the lines. I simply stated "Jaffe" never allowed it. That was Twisted Metal 3 aka 989 Studios Sweet Tooth version when they had the license. So yes, Yawn more please.
Maybe it was because there weren't many cross overs that they could have put an ice cream truck driver in considering in all of his appearances he was bound to the truck until that mode in the TMHO remake came out where you could run around as Sweet Tooth. Sweet Tooth (as seen through cut scenes, especially TMB) is much more brutal than Kratos. If they didn't think that Quan Chi was enough of a Clown that they didn't need Sweet Tooth maybe we could have a good character as opposed to Quan Chi's sissy Twin Brother that apparently most of the people who are true MK fans are mad about because they don't want guest characters to begin with because MK Vs DC turned out to be absolutely terrible. Now I agree with no guest characters but if they had to put someone in why couldn't they have at least made it someone mildly cool?
Look first and foremost man, I want to point out I don't have nothing against you. I hope we can be friends down the line. But on subject, I have nothing against you or anyone else here who have opinions on this game and characters. I do respect and admire as well as take into consideration what has been stated from both sides of the clause being happy or disappointed. I do think Sweet Tooth would of been alright for MK he's just as ruthless no doubt. But the fact that Sweet Tooth is a clown and a badass one at that. He wouldn't fit due to the lack of Fighting Experience. Kratos is similar to Kahn in that he fights, fights, kills, etc. Needles he just kills and drives around. He has no real experience in anything outside of Knives and Guns to my degree. Just saying Kratos is more built to fight in an MK environment due to the Countless battles he's had with many of the gods and what not.
I'm a BIG and I mean BIG TM fan. Tho I don't think that Sweet Tooth could ever fit into the Mk world. If you could please give some feed on how/why he would fit that would be cool
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.