~Crow~ Wrote:
You know, I'm a little sick at all the "conservative" rap that's taking place in here. Whenever I say anything, it's all like "oh but not you Crow", well then who is it? I've gone through this topic and I can't find a single person complaining about this just for the sake of the characters having too little clothing on. The complaint always seems to be that having this amount of clothing on doesn't seem to fit in with the character.
It's ridiculous, and it doesn't make your argument any better to take cheap shots at phantom people that don't even exist. Let's just grow up and accept some people have different opinions on what characters should wear, for reasons not pertaining to 'conservative values' and move on. I can't help but feel like people are trying to demean the argument that a character's attire should make sense with (what that person) thinks of the character by basically making fun of it with this nonsense. It's childish. You can say I don't have a sense of humor if that makes you feel better, but I've looked at this for days and said nothing, and it's getting a little old at this point.
*insert picture of a dead horse with people beating it*
You know, I'm a little sick at all the "conservative" rap that's taking place in here. Whenever I say anything, it's all like "oh but not you Crow", well then who is it? I've gone through this topic and I can't find a single person complaining about this just for the sake of the characters having too little clothing on. The complaint always seems to be that having this amount of clothing on doesn't seem to fit in with the character.
It's ridiculous, and it doesn't make your argument any better to take cheap shots at phantom people that don't even exist. Let's just grow up and accept some people have different opinions on what characters should wear, for reasons not pertaining to 'conservative values' and move on. I can't help but feel like people are trying to demean the argument that a character's attire should make sense with (what that person) thinks of the character by basically making fun of it with this nonsense. It's childish. You can say I don't have a sense of humor if that makes you feel better, but I've looked at this for days and said nothing, and it's getting a little old at this point.
*insert picture of a dead horse with people beating it*
I already inserted a picture of a dead horse being beaten. We are now officially at the level of beating a dead horse with the corpses of other dead horses.
I've actually progressed beyond caring, but rather I'm finding a bit of sadistic glee in how both extremists are so upset with how she should or should not look. I am ultimately of the opinion that, hey, it's puerile video game fantasy and that Sonya is still more conservatively dressed than 90% of all video game women, and also the hilarity that the people that CREATED her apparently can't decide what is or is not in character for her to wear or act like.
You can bet your bottom Sonya's gonna have a different alternate costume. I heard these same complaints about her MK:DA design when I first joined here years ago ("her boobs are huge and they bounce so much!" "Why's her shirt so small?" "Is that a thong?" "Why does she look like a shaved ape... and why does that turn me on?"), I heard it about her Shoalin Monk's version, I heard it about her MK vs DC version... and I'm hearing it now. And every time, without fail, fans warm up to the design and then, when the new one comes along, they go "why can't it look more like the old version?" I'm sure they'll say it again next game.
And as I've said in another thread, it doesn't matter to me what she wears.... I'm picturing her naked in my head regardless, whether she's wearing a bikini thong or full-body armor. Where there's a will, there's a vivid imagination that finds a way. Huzzah!
In the end, I suppose me and the "other half" are just simply more about visuals than realism. I have never stared more often at a newly-revealed Sonya, not even in MKDC, her first outing in "new gen". I like what I see a lot, and I am nearing a panic attack that stems merely from wanting to watch her whoop ass in those sexy twenty-three inch heels. If she doesn't look like she's working and on the clock, well, I don't give two rat asses. All I know is she looks good.
I do understand the logic some of you guys have presented, and yes, I in fact do agree that this outfit is not befitting a lieutenant. What it comes down to is that we, the "other half", are willing to let go much more easily for the sake of having a sexy + bad-ass Sonya. You guys aren't. You want Sonya to ooze professionalism out of her pores, and let her sexiness be a subtle hint of what might be. We just want our equation. Sexy + Bad-ass = Sonya. That's it. Nothing in MK screams "realism" to me, and if I'm willing to submerse myself in absolutely nonsensical fun, than I am more than comfortable watching Sonya throw a high kick in heels.
I do understand the logic some of you guys have presented, and yes, I in fact do agree that this outfit is not befitting a lieutenant. What it comes down to is that we, the "other half", are willing to let go much more easily for the sake of having a sexy + bad-ass Sonya. You guys aren't. You want Sonya to ooze professionalism out of her pores, and let her sexiness be a subtle hint of what might be. We just want our equation. Sexy + Bad-ass = Sonya. That's it. Nothing in MK screams "realism" to me, and if I'm willing to submerse myself in absolutely nonsensical fun, than I am more than comfortable watching Sonya throw a high kick in heels.
Bloodfang •11/25/2010 10:51 AM (UTC) •
0
~Crow~ Wrote:
You know, I'm a little sick at all the "conservative" rap that's taking place in here. Whenever I say anything, it's all like "oh but not you Crow", well then who is it? I've gone through this topic and I can't find a single person complaining about this just for the sake of the characters having too little clothing on. The complaint always seems to be that having this amount of clothing on doesn't seem to fit in with the character
You know, I'm a little sick at all the "conservative" rap that's taking place in here. Whenever I say anything, it's all like "oh but not you Crow", well then who is it? I've gone through this topic and I can't find a single person complaining about this just for the sake of the characters having too little clothing on. The complaint always seems to be that having this amount of clothing on doesn't seem to fit in with the character
Not a single ONE really??? The number of times slut, hooker, whore, etc. is used on this forum is well I'll just post a few from this and some from others (one I can't paste is the title of a closed thread called "The girls look like whores..." Closed I add because there were other topics saying the exact same thing!). I really didn't want to post this HUGE a list but you did ask me too. Sorry. Although I am not attacking all of the posts below I am simply doing what Crow and Mick-Lucifer asked me to do and show them where the references to people yelling about "sluts, etc." is coming from so these are SOME of the posts where someone references slut or something derogatory even if (For some at least) the rest of the argument may indeed be about not fitting the character's persona.
BIG_SYKE19 Wrote:
the design is good. BUT NOT FOR SPECIAL FORCES. why is her chest so open. SLUT!!!! and her belly button is showing. at least her and jax have on green pants to show common ground. and she's missing all of the military equipment, no gadget belt. im not digging all that green either.
the design is good. BUT NOT FOR SPECIAL FORCES. why is her chest so open. SLUT!!!! and her belly button is showing. at least her and jax have on green pants to show common ground. and she's missing all of the military equipment, no gadget belt. im not digging all that green either.
Redeemed self in later posts so meh.
FROST4584 Wrote:
The MK team destroys yet another cool female character. First Kitana and Mileena look like hookers, now Sonya doesn't even have that tough girl look anymore. She looks like a 20 something female blond at a Halloween party.
What a disappointment MK team , if you guys claim to be retelling MK, could you at least make your female look something a across between their old outfits with new designs, instead of showing way too much skin?
Not impressed -_- at all.
The MK team destroys yet another cool female character. First Kitana and Mileena look like hookers, now Sonya doesn't even have that tough girl look anymore. She looks like a 20 something female blond at a Halloween party.
What a disappointment MK team , if you guys claim to be retelling MK, could you at least make your female look something a across between their old outfits with new designs, instead of showing way too much skin?
Not impressed -_- at all.
Hookers and a bimbo reference.
DigitalAssassin Wrote:
I'm confused. She looks like a porn star. Is she trying to impress someone at the tournament? Maybe one of the ninjas? She's a heartbreaker for sure.
Listen all jokes aside, (excuse my language) this design is total shit, she looks like a whore, i'm sorry. NRS please give us an intimidating badass looking sonya.
I'm confused. She looks like a porn star. Is she trying to impress someone at the tournament? Maybe one of the ninjas? She's a heartbreaker for sure.
Listen all jokes aside, (excuse my language) this design is total shit, she looks like a whore, i'm sorry. NRS please give us an intimidating badass looking sonya.
Porn star and a whore.
TheManWithTheGoldenGun Wrote:
Implying most of the women in these games should be dressed as anything more than sluts at most of you people have said they look like.
Implying most of the women in these games should be dressed as anything more than sluts at most of you people have said they look like.
Of course to be honest I can't tell if he's supporting or countering the view due to grammar...
MINION Wrote:
^ What he said. Well said. Theres a difference between sexy and slutty. Kira is the Slutty Sonya while Sonya should of remained the more efficient and professional-esque Sonya.
^ What he said. Well said. Theres a difference between sexy and slutty. Kira is the Slutty Sonya while Sonya should of remained the more efficient and professional-esque Sonya.
Well while he discusses Kira as the "slutty sonya" he implies that this sonya is slutty and therefore more kira. So both a valid point and a use of the the word "slut". lol
FROST4584 Wrote:One as note, where are people getting the idea that Mileena liked using her body to get men? Hell it wasn't untill Mortal Kombat Deception that she started wearing those sluty outfils. Back before Deception, she and the other MK females had style and substance. Therefore , why in the heck does Kitana and Mileena look like they do in this game? Its so silly that the MK team has screwed over some some of the greatest female characters, just for more appeal to the young boys. This isn't doing justice of how characters where represented.
Makes reference to Mileena being slutty in between valid points.
ActingArtist Wrote:
Well I never really post on here, but I've been a member for years and years and years and I lurk.
Let me just say that I am so excited about Sonya's new look. She has always been my favorite character. I am loving the vest, the cleavage, the pants, the hair... all of it. And yeah, it may not be exactly practical for her to have her tits all exposed, but oh well... this is a GAME. I'm a hardcore fan like all of you, but honestly, chill out. This is a game with fictional characters. And maybe I can say that because I am loving the look. Sex sells, and I can be a whore.
Well I never really post on here, but I've been a member for years and years and years and I lurk.
Let me just say that I am so excited about Sonya's new look. She has always been my favorite character. I am loving the vest, the cleavage, the pants, the hair... all of it. And yeah, it may not be exactly practical for her to have her tits all exposed, but oh well... this is a GAME. I'm a hardcore fan like all of you, but honestly, chill out. This is a game with fictional characters. And maybe I can say that because I am loving the look. Sex sells, and I can be a whore.
Supports the look but still calls her a whore.. Trying to take back the word?? LMAO...
The_Truth Wrote:
This is my first chance to see Sonya and...it's bad. The body, face, and hair are fine. In fact she looks great on that end. The costume is fucking horrible though. Can't say I didn't expect it but I mean fuck. Is she SF or a biker slut?
This is my first chance to see Sonya and...it's bad. The body, face, and hair are fine. In fact she looks great on that end. The costume is fucking horrible though. Can't say I didn't expect it but I mean fuck. Is she SF or a biker slut?
Biker Slut...
DigitalAssassin Wrote:
I guess it's safe to say that 80% of the MK community agrees that sonya looks like a whore.
I guess it's safe to say that 80% of the MK community agrees that sonya looks like a whore.
Apparently according to this false statistic you are ignoring 80% of the MK community when you say I have no evidence to back up my complaint on the OVERUSE of "whore" as a descriptive adjective! In your defense however, I wouldn't have gone THAT far with my estimate. I think it's more than a few but not 80%... lol.
Nutlink Wrote:
No....just....no. They finally got her hair and face right, but the damn outfit. Total slutty S&M look. I want to like Sonya, I really do, but I can't stand these costumes they give her. The sluttiest she should get is olive drab pants and a tank top. Otherwise throw her in full BDUs. If you want to say she's no longer military but OIA, fine. Give her an image similar to C. Viper in Street Fighter. Just once, I'd like to have an MK female who's not a skank.
No....just....no. They finally got her hair and face right, but the damn outfit. Total slutty S&M look. I want to like Sonya, I really do, but I can't stand these costumes they give her. The sluttiest she should get is olive drab pants and a tank top. Otherwise throw her in full BDUs. If you want to say she's no longer military but OIA, fine. Give her an image similar to C. Viper in Street Fighter. Just once, I'd like to have an MK female who's not a skank.
Slutty, sluttiest, and skank.
The_Truth Wrote:
It is what it is.
WarriorPrincess Wrote:
Oy Vey, can people not think of anything more creative to say than slut? skank? or whore? Where is the constructive criticism that doesn't involve using those terms to get a point across? Saying you don't like the outfit is one thing, but being degrading for the sake of it is is rather annoying.
Oy Vey, can people not think of anything more creative to say than slut? skank? or whore? Where is the constructive criticism that doesn't involve using those terms to get a point across? Saying you don't like the outfit is one thing, but being degrading for the sake of it is is rather annoying.
It is what it is.
Quoted person is (like me) annoyed at overuse of stated terms being used over and over and over... poster disagrees and lends support to use of said words.
fedegita Wrote:
Right. But what are the chances of seeing them this time around? Nope, looks like we'll have to deal with the MK team's pubescent fantasies for now.
Then again, I wouldn't pout it past boon et al to turn even those two characters into sluts. After all, it's what the fans want, right?
Chrome Wrote:
Yeah. Frost perhaps.
NS922 Wrote:
For everyone asking, "Why can't MK have a female that isn't a slut, skank, or whore?", I say:
Ashrah.
For everyone asking, "Why can't MK have a female that isn't a slut, skank, or whore?", I say:
Ashrah.
Yeah. Frost perhaps.
Right. But what are the chances of seeing them this time around? Nope, looks like we'll have to deal with the MK team's pubescent fantasies for now.
Then again, I wouldn't pout it past boon et al to turn even those two characters into sluts. After all, it's what the fans want, right?
Because revealing outfits automatically mean slut apparently.
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Dressing scantily clad does not make a slut or a whore or whatever. Showing cleavage and belly does not equal that they are sleeping around. The only one that is hinted on doing so is Mileena, due to the whole man-eater title she's been given by the MK team. Otherwise, it is quite the harsh name-calling that seems to have become rather common amongst the users of this forum.
Sonya's new outfit is rather revealing compared to her previous appearances, but that doesn't make her a slut. The women of Mortal Kombat are strong warriors, assassins and soldiers. They are lightly clad for the most part for several reasons. It has become a quite common for fighting games to have their female characters clad very lightly and sexy, to attract the male audience. Also, wearing heavy armour prevents the characters to move freely around and thus most of the characters, male and female alike, are clad lightly.
However, the problem lies in the fact that there are many ways to be lightly clad and still be sexy without showing off some certain assets, and the women of MK do not exploit those possibilities except for a few of them. Sonya was one of them. Though she showed her thong in MKDA-MKA and wore no bra underneath her shirt in MKvsDCU, she was still respectively covered up. As a military woman, Sonya is a muscular and well-trained soldier, but she is still feminine and sexy in her appearance. Showing off her muscles is a sign of pride of her job and herself, such as showing off her belly.
The Edenians have always been known for showing off their female assets in their revealing outfits, and in the upcoming MK it appears to be to take the step further with Mileena's and Kitana's new outfits. However, it came as a surprise that Sonya took that step further as well. And as this thread shows, it made quite the impact on us as fans. To such an extend that people now tend to call the women of MK for whores and sluts which in my opinion is too harsh, and also an incorrect term overall.
I agree that Sonya's new outfit is too revealing, and I have also explained earlier in this thread why that is. But I would not call it slutty. It looks like something Nina Williams would wear, but she has never dressed slutty (I don't call wearing a spandex bodysuit for slutty. If that's the case, then Spiderman and Superman would be defined as slutty as well).
I like the outfit though... just not for Sonya.
Dressing scantily clad does not make a slut or a whore or whatever. Showing cleavage and belly does not equal that they are sleeping around. The only one that is hinted on doing so is Mileena, due to the whole man-eater title she's been given by the MK team. Otherwise, it is quite the harsh name-calling that seems to have become rather common amongst the users of this forum.
Sonya's new outfit is rather revealing compared to her previous appearances, but that doesn't make her a slut. The women of Mortal Kombat are strong warriors, assassins and soldiers. They are lightly clad for the most part for several reasons. It has become a quite common for fighting games to have their female characters clad very lightly and sexy, to attract the male audience. Also, wearing heavy armour prevents the characters to move freely around and thus most of the characters, male and female alike, are clad lightly.
However, the problem lies in the fact that there are many ways to be lightly clad and still be sexy without showing off some certain assets, and the women of MK do not exploit those possibilities except for a few of them. Sonya was one of them. Though she showed her thong in MKDA-MKA and wore no bra underneath her shirt in MKvsDCU, she was still respectively covered up. As a military woman, Sonya is a muscular and well-trained soldier, but she is still feminine and sexy in her appearance. Showing off her muscles is a sign of pride of her job and herself, such as showing off her belly.
The Edenians have always been known for showing off their female assets in their revealing outfits, and in the upcoming MK it appears to be to take the step further with Mileena's and Kitana's new outfits. However, it came as a surprise that Sonya took that step further as well. And as this thread shows, it made quite the impact on us as fans. To such an extend that people now tend to call the women of MK for whores and sluts which in my opinion is too harsh, and also an incorrect term overall.
I agree that Sonya's new outfit is too revealing, and I have also explained earlier in this thread why that is. But I would not call it slutty. It looks like something Nina Williams would wear, but she has never dressed slutty (I don't call wearing a spandex bodysuit for slutty. If that's the case, then Spiderman and Superman would be defined as slutty as well).
I like the outfit though... just not for Sonya.
Makes all valid points and once again speaks out AGAINST the constant need to call the girls disreputable just because of wardrobe choices. lol
Nathan Wrote:
First character re-design where I can honestly say, I don't like it. Not that she pretty much looks like Nina Williams, she also also looks, and I agree with anyone who said it before, like a hooker.
I prefer her Deadly Alliance and Shaolin Monks designs, way over this overly slutted up one.
First character re-design where I can honestly say, I don't like it. Not that she pretty much looks like Nina Williams, she also also looks, and I agree with anyone who said it before, like a hooker.
I prefer her Deadly Alliance and Shaolin Monks designs, way over this overly slutted up one.
Kazmer13 Wrote:
I like sluts so I like this look, just wish I could see it in hi res!
For those that don't like it, don't worry... *cough*alternate costumes*cough*
I like sluts so I like this look, just wish I could see it in hi res!
For those that don't like it, don't worry... *cough*alternate costumes*cough*
queve Wrote:
Well said.
I've always disagreed with the harsh words such as "slut", "whore", and "skank" to refer to the half-naked females. I mean, come on. I understand why it can be disliked (I don't think it fits many of them), but, I can't understand the need to refer to Sindel as a whore for revealing as much as she does.
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Dressing scantily clad does not make a slut or a whore or whatever. Showing cleavage and belly does not equal that they are sleeping around.....However, the problem lies in the fact that there are many ways to be lightly clad and still be sexy without showing off some certain assets, and the women of MK do not exploit those possibilities except for a few of them. Sonya was one of them. Though she showed her thong in MKDA-MKA and wore no bra underneath her shirt in MKvsDCU, she was still respectively covered up. As a military woman, Sonya is a muscular and well-trained soldier, but she is still feminine and sexy in her appearance. Showing off her muscles is a sign of pride of her job and herself, such as showing off her belly.....
Dressing scantily clad does not make a slut or a whore or whatever. Showing cleavage and belly does not equal that they are sleeping around.....However, the problem lies in the fact that there are many ways to be lightly clad and still be sexy without showing off some certain assets, and the women of MK do not exploit those possibilities except for a few of them. Sonya was one of them. Though she showed her thong in MKDA-MKA and wore no bra underneath her shirt in MKvsDCU, she was still respectively covered up. As a military woman, Sonya is a muscular and well-trained soldier, but she is still feminine and sexy in her appearance. Showing off her muscles is a sign of pride of her job and herself, such as showing off her belly.....
Well said.
I've always disagreed with the harsh words such as "slut", "whore", and "skank" to refer to the half-naked females. I mean, come on. I understand why it can be disliked (I don't think it fits many of them), but, I can't understand the need to refer to Sindel as a whore for revealing as much as she does.
I love queve's posts and once again queve comes to the rescue of the female cast. Honorable mention to Jaded-Raven as well...
.... can I please stop now this is way too long. Is this enough evidence... I think it is guys. I mean a lot of these are blended into actually VALID points but those points are diminished by constantly tossing around derogatory names and saying that the characters must be disreputable just because of how they dress. I reiterate again that YES the posters did have valid points about things not fitting in character by their opinion and those arguments would have been just as good as Queve's, Jaded-Raven's, Crow's, Mick-Lucifer's, etc. if they didn't have so much reliance on "ad hominem" (attacks against someone's or this case a character's character).
So I apologize for the long list of quotes but as I said you asked me to show you proof. It doesn't represent the majority of the posts and sure as hell doesn't represent 80% LOL but it is a repetitive minority. To Mick-Lucifer and Crow, you're posts have always struck me as intelligent and well-argued even if I don't agree with you some of the time. I often do agree with you on many points. You were never intended as targets of my rants as you were not the ones making the above mentioned complaints. In fact you both repeatedly tried to bring things BACK on topic to a mature and civilized debate as a forum should be. So hate away on me... lol. You asked for the proof and I asked for my soon to be ass-chewing. So I'll just sit back and laugh my ass off so there won't be any of it left for any one else!
WarriorPrincess •11/25/2010 10:59 AM (UTC) •
0
Thank You BloodFang!
Bloodfang •11/25/2010 11:04 AM (UTC) •
0
WarriorPrincess Wrote:
Thank You BloodFang!
Thank You BloodFang!
::wipes brow:: That was TOO long by my standards... seriously... don't EVER EVER ask me to do something like that again... lol. I must now keel over from abject redundany. I apologize to all of you (especially those without scroll-buttons), but nobody more so than those who don't need to be criticized for the RIDICULOUS overuse of calling someone "slutty" simply because of how they are dressed. HUGE derailing of topic here and I am sorry but I must come to the defense of even virtual fictional ladies and their freedom to wear whatever they want... lol.
MoodyShooter •11/25/2010 12:27 PM (UTC) •
About Me
Dedicated, hopeless...Li Mei fan.
0
Yup, those were my initial snap reactions and I stand by them because those were, as stated, how I felt when I saw the picture of her. I didn't see Sonya, I saw some blonde chick in tight leather that looked more at home on a Harley at Sturgis than someone of respect and authority in a US government organization. As a fan of the SF characters I just think they deserve better and smarter designs. Again here's hoping they can come up with an alternate that I can dig because this current one doesn't work for me.
Whatever, as I stated before it is what it is. What it is depends on your perspective. The end.
Whatever, as I stated before it is what it is. What it is depends on your perspective. The end.
Mick-Lucifer
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response! •11/25/2010 12:33 PM (UTC) •
About Me
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
0
"Slut" and "whore" might not be my go-to phrase of reference, but I think for all intents and purposes it's a fair enough shorthand for what most people seem to be trying to express. I'm not really seeing a lot of mindless conservative agendas being pushed here. If you accept that there's a reasonable argument to be made about the inconsistency of the design as a reflection of Sonya's character, then I think it's reasonable to also see these references as unelaborative remarks about the same.
I'd be very surprised if there were legitimate conservatives jumping on an MK board to talk about how much the older games' designs were better.
To me, the entire argument is about a shallow pattern emerging in the design of the MK women, which shows little to no regard to what we can source from their established character. Mileena could be rationalized, Kitana was a bit more of a stretch, and now Sonya requires the most grace to be deemed acceptable. Yes, there's an element of negativity with regards to the overt sexuality of the characters, but one would presume anyone complaining about that, regardless of their shorthand, is upset because it's motivated by cheap tricks. Not because they want women to be wrapped head-to-toe in cloth. Which is probably why the reaction has seemed quite ridiculous.
I'd be very surprised if there were legitimate conservatives jumping on an MK board to talk about how much the older games' designs were better.
To me, the entire argument is about a shallow pattern emerging in the design of the MK women, which shows little to no regard to what we can source from their established character. Mileena could be rationalized, Kitana was a bit more of a stretch, and now Sonya requires the most grace to be deemed acceptable. Yes, there's an element of negativity with regards to the overt sexuality of the characters, but one would presume anyone complaining about that, regardless of their shorthand, is upset because it's motivated by cheap tricks. Not because they want women to be wrapped head-to-toe in cloth. Which is probably why the reaction has seemed quite ridiculous.
Using the words "whore" etc. does not necessarily mean the post is bad OR that they are saying it without reason. Just read! All of those people question whether she is what her profession is! They are just using phrases to describe what they think she looks like, but it has nothing to do with conservatism. It's again because she's Sonya, and because of what her role is. Perhaps they aren't as eloquent as I, but who is? But in all seriousness... I just don't use words like that in my argument, others do. I don't feel using the terms "whore" or "slut" mean they are prudes. Again, they aren't complaining for the sake of complaining, all of those complaints come in because the design is not befitting to Sonya.
KitanaMileena92 •11/25/2010 04:15 PM (UTC) •
0
Since seeing the HQ pic of her I like her alot more.
She looks tough and sexy. I dont think her costume is too vulgar. Im just gald she doesnt have a man jaw like in MKvsDC.
She looks tough and sexy. I dont think her costume is too vulgar. Im just gald she doesnt have a man jaw like in MKvsDC.
JADEdSCORPION •11/25/2010 04:23 PM (UTC) •
0
Mick-Lucifer Wrote:
There's absolutely no comaprable correlation between these two fictional aspects of MK and what they mean to the series. It would be an incredibly dubious argument to make, one with no real grounding or logical form. It's a proposition that just as easily dismisses the existence of the sun and moon in the game, as any other interpretive realistic fact.
EDIT: Not that there isn't some merit to the notion of monks not killing. Hong Kong fooey and unreal feats of strength have always been much closer to the exposed, disembodied heart of MK, however. Martial arts bros came long before misguided design hoes.
JADEdSCORPION Wrote:
I'll have to agree with those users who remark that some think it's TOTALLY ok for a guy to throw his hat down and saw you apart genitals first through your face and have you hanging in half as two bloody parts, but will gawk and moan when a woman is scantily clad. Something doesn't quite add up to me. I'm not saying that the female characters should be half naked, but how can you sacrifice one over the other. How can you possibly make a valid argument detesting overt female sexuality, but not the dismemberment/burning/slicing of a man or woman?
I'll have to agree with those users who remark that some think it's TOTALLY ok for a guy to throw his hat down and saw you apart genitals first through your face and have you hanging in half as two bloody parts, but will gawk and moan when a woman is scantily clad. Something doesn't quite add up to me. I'm not saying that the female characters should be half naked, but how can you sacrifice one over the other. How can you possibly make a valid argument detesting overt female sexuality, but not the dismemberment/burning/slicing of a man or woman?
There's absolutely no comaprable correlation between these two fictional aspects of MK and what they mean to the series. It would be an incredibly dubious argument to make, one with no real grounding or logical form. It's a proposition that just as easily dismisses the existence of the sun and moon in the game, as any other interpretive realistic fact.
EDIT: Not that there isn't some merit to the notion of monks not killing. Hong Kong fooey and unreal feats of strength have always been much closer to the exposed, disembodied heart of MK, however. Martial arts bros came long before misguided design hoes.
I'll have to vehemently disagree. I am not basing my argument on the grounds of fiction and whether or not ficition is applicable to either. I'm basing my argument on the commanlity between the EXTREMES of both overt sexuality and gratuitous violence. They are COMPLETELY and TOTALLY related. This is a game built on excess, and I don't see how you can't see the correlation personally. Go to sleep for a couple hours and totally miss my chance to defend my argument. Regardless...HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE WHO CELEBRATES IT!!!
JADEdSCORPION Wrote:
I'll have to vehemently disagree. I am not basing my argument on the grounds of fiction and whether or not ficition is applicable to either. I'm basing my argument on the commanlity between the EXTREMES of both overt sexuality and gratuitous violence. They are COMPLETELY and TOTALLY related. This is a game built on excess, and I don't see how you can't see the correlation personally. Go to sleep for a couple hours and totally miss my chance to defend my argument. Regardless...HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE WHO CELEBRATES IT!!!
Mick-Lucifer Wrote:
There's absolutely no comaprable correlation between these two fictional aspects of MK and what they mean to the series. It would be an incredibly dubious argument to make, one with no real grounding or logical form. It's a proposition that just as easily dismisses the existence of the sun and moon in the game, as any other interpretive realistic fact.
EDIT: Not that there isn't some merit to the notion of monks not killing. Hong Kong fooey and unreal feats of strength have always been much closer to the exposed, disembodied heart of MK, however. Martial arts bros came long before misguided design hoes.
JADEdSCORPION Wrote:
I'll have to agree with those users who remark that some think it's TOTALLY ok for a guy to throw his hat down and saw you apart genitals first through your face and have you hanging in half as two bloody parts, but will gawk and moan when a woman is scantily clad. Something doesn't quite add up to me. I'm not saying that the female characters should be half naked, but how can you sacrifice one over the other. How can you possibly make a valid argument detesting overt female sexuality, but not the dismemberment/burning/slicing of a man or woman?
I'll have to agree with those users who remark that some think it's TOTALLY ok for a guy to throw his hat down and saw you apart genitals first through your face and have you hanging in half as two bloody parts, but will gawk and moan when a woman is scantily clad. Something doesn't quite add up to me. I'm not saying that the female characters should be half naked, but how can you sacrifice one over the other. How can you possibly make a valid argument detesting overt female sexuality, but not the dismemberment/burning/slicing of a man or woman?
There's absolutely no comaprable correlation between these two fictional aspects of MK and what they mean to the series. It would be an incredibly dubious argument to make, one with no real grounding or logical form. It's a proposition that just as easily dismisses the existence of the sun and moon in the game, as any other interpretive realistic fact.
EDIT: Not that there isn't some merit to the notion of monks not killing. Hong Kong fooey and unreal feats of strength have always been much closer to the exposed, disembodied heart of MK, however. Martial arts bros came long before misguided design hoes.
I'll have to vehemently disagree. I am not basing my argument on the grounds of fiction and whether or not ficition is applicable to either. I'm basing my argument on the commanlity between the EXTREMES of both overt sexuality and gratuitous violence. They are COMPLETELY and TOTALLY related. This is a game built on excess, and I don't see how you can't see the correlation personally. Go to sleep for a couple hours and totally miss my chance to defend my argument. Regardless...HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE WHO CELEBRATES IT!!!
This is not necessarily true. Play games like Resident Evil, Silent Hill or any other survival horror game. They feature heavy violence, yet there's little if any overt sexuality. The two don't correlate unless the developer wishes them to. There's no rule that it has to be this way.
Also, I wanted to reply to a point brought up by Garlador about this being the developers' creation. Yes, the MK team develops all the characters. But without the community there would be no video games. As you stated, Samus was not well received in Other M despite this being what some of her creators envisioned for her. You then go on to say you aren't worried because you doubt that Samus will ever been seen again. Why do you think that? If that's what the developers want for her, why would they change it? The feedback is why. Just because the developer thinks it is a good idea does not mean that it is. Therefore, much like those Samus fans, I am voicing my displeasure in their female character design in the hopes they will hear enough of us and change their tendencies to strip the personality from these characters by stripping off their clothing.
~Crow~ Wrote:
Using the words "whore" etc. does not necessarily mean the post is bad OR that they are saying it without reason. Just read! All of those people question whether she is what her profession is! They are just using phrases to describe what they think she looks like, but it has nothing to do with conservatism. It's again because she's Sonya, and because of what her role is. Perhaps they aren't as eloquent as I, but who is? But in all seriousness... I just don't use words like that in my argument, others do. I don't feel using the terms "whore" or "slut" mean they are prudes. Again, they aren't complaining for the sake of complaining, all of those complaints come in because the design is not befitting to Sonya.
Using the words "whore" etc. does not necessarily mean the post is bad OR that they are saying it without reason. Just read! All of those people question whether she is what her profession is! They are just using phrases to describe what they think she looks like, but it has nothing to do with conservatism. It's again because she's Sonya, and because of what her role is. Perhaps they aren't as eloquent as I, but who is? But in all seriousness... I just don't use words like that in my argument, others do. I don't feel using the terms "whore" or "slut" mean they are prudes. Again, they aren't complaining for the sake of complaining, all of those complaints come in because the design is not befitting to Sonya.
Of course, who has the real final say on what is "befitting" of Sonya? People rejected Heath Ledger's Joker PASSIONATELY when he was first cast... they said "this isn't the Joker", and the guy went on to win an Oscar for the role.
People complained about her thong, but she's officially worn one for two games and had thong-tan lines in another. So that's three games where a thong was an essential part of her wardrobe. Every single game has her wearing exceptionally tight shirts, exposing cleavage, side-boob, navel, and sometimes more. She's worn form-fitting pants in several games that show off her delicious stems and curvy behind. Can you name a single thing about her MK1-MK3 costumes that had even a hint of military in them beyond "she's got some green"?
I would like to plainly ask what is not befitting of her, because the same complaints I keep hearing over and over could be lobbied at almost every single one of her previous looks and designs.
And ultimately, NRS is the one that ultimately decides what Sonya's personality is and what clothes "befit" her. Ed Boon, her co-creator, is still having final say over her development. What I'm seeing is not arguments about whether Sonya's design is "suitable" for her, but rather other people upset she doesn't conform to their ideal standard and keep projecting that onto the character.
It could very well be that, no, this is Sonya. This IS how she dresses. This is how she behaves. If people want to focus on her T&A and overlook her actions, her poise, her personality and words, her background, and just how much ass she can kick, that's their loss.
~Crow~ Wrote:
This is not necessarily true. Play games like Resident Evil, Silent Hill or any other survival horror game. They feature heavy violence, yet there's little if any overt sexuality. The two don't correlate unless the developer wishes them to. There's no rule that it has to be this way.
As a passionate Resident Evil and Silent Hill fan, and Survival Horror game aficionado, that's really not the case. How practical was it in Resident Evil 3 for Jill to run around in a miniskirt and a tube top surrounded by flesh-eating zombies? Resident Evil 5 has a costume for Sheva that's just warpaint and leopard skin and is extremely skimpy and Jill Valentine's costume was so tight they actually modeled in camel toe for her (seriously). That excludes characters that ARE overly sexual, like Excella Giolla and Ada Wong (who fights zombies in a cocktail dress and high heels). Silent Hill is EXTREMELY sexual. It is arguably the most sexual game series ever made outside of porn. Silent Hill 2 has rape in it, seduction, strippers, the whole shebang. Silent Hill: Shattered Memories asks you about your own sexual quirks and the game gets more sexual the more you gravitate to those interests, including showing characters with more sexuality, cleavage, and monsters with enlarged female physiques. Silent Hill 4 had unlockable fetish outfits of lingerie and a sexy nurse, Silent Hill 3 had tons of unlockable costumes (including one where Heather transforms into a Sailor Moon knockoff, but not before getting naked), and Silent Hill 1's Lisa was revealed to have slept around for drug money. It's a pretty intensely sexual series, and even it's demented sexual, busty, deformed nurses are symbolic with the series itself. This is not necessarily true. Play games like Resident Evil, Silent Hill or any other survival horror game. They feature heavy violence, yet there's little if any overt sexuality. The two don't correlate unless the developer wishes them to. There's no rule that it has to be this way.
~Crow~ Wrote:Also, I wanted to reply to a point brought up by Garlador about this being the developers' creation. Yes, the MK team develops all the characters. But without the community there would be no video games. As you stated, Samus was not well received in Other M despite this being what some of her creators envisioned for her. You then go on to say you aren't worried because you doubt that Samus will ever been seen again. Why do you think that? If that's what the developers want for her, why would they change it? The feedback is why. Just because the developer thinks it is a good idea does not mean that it is. Therefore, much like those Samus fans, I am voicing my displeasure in their female character design in the hopes they will hear enough of us and change their tendencies to strip the personality from these characters by stripping off their clothing.
As Crow mentioned, this reminds me of the debacle with Samus Aran in Metroid: Other M, except that WAS a genuine character shift. That was different than a purely aesthetic make-over (though 6'3" Samus DID shrink so that she was towered over by all the men.) From strong, independent, stoic, and brave to weak, codependent, chatty, and crying hysterically throughout the game. So, unless Sonya breaks down crying in front of Kano, gives Shao Kahn a stripper-pole dance, or ends up playing beach volleyball with Kitana and Mileena, I think people are blowing this out of proportion.
RazorsEdge701 •11/25/2010 04:35 PM (UTC) •
0
~Crow~ Wrote:
You then go on to say you aren't worried because you doubt that Samus will ever been seen again. Why do you think that? If that's what the developers want for her, why would they change it? The feedback is why.
You then go on to say you aren't worried because you doubt that Samus will ever been seen again. Why do you think that? If that's what the developers want for her, why would they change it? The feedback is why.
Exactly. If we don't tell the creators they are doing something wrong, they're just going to keep fucking doing it wrong.
That's just a bad way to look at things. "They made the game, it means they're always right" is the gist of your post. If we as fans don't complain, we don't get rid of terrible things like animalities, babalities, broken fighting engine or anything else they've ever done wrong. No one is perfect, and a good fan of the series is objective to the point where they can tell the developer of the game what it is they didn't like.
I am never going to be one of those fans that sit back and praise everything. I feel it is untrue to yourself and detrimental to the game in general. Without criticism you will end up with a lower quality product.
I am never going to be one of those fans that sit back and praise everything. I feel it is untrue to yourself and detrimental to the game in general. Without criticism you will end up with a lower quality product.
MortalMushroom •11/25/2010 04:38 PM (UTC) •
About Me
hey
0
Man, if they weree truthful when they said they read most of the forums then they probably will take a little more time to tweak the design more because this topic is growing pages every day. I do agree it should be tweaked slightly.
JADEdSCORPION •11/25/2010 04:44 PM (UTC) •
0
I don't want to quote cuz it looks messy lol. However, @ Crow: I'm not saying that they automatically have to go with one another. I never said that there was some unspoken rule they had to go hand in hand. I'm just saying, when I see both in a form that's so extreme in a game/movie/etc I'm not offended or shocked by one more than the other. I was just curious as to how people could be more offended by one than the other, never stating that they must be together at the same time all the time.
JADEdSCORPION Wrote:
I don't want to quote cuz it looks messy lol. However, @ Crow: I'm not saying that they automatically have to go with one another. I never said that there was some unspoken rule they had to go hand in hand. I'm just saying, when I see both in a form that's so extreme in a game/movie/etc I'm not offended or shocked by one more than the other. I was just curious as to how people could be more offended by one than the other, never stating that they must be together at the same time all the time.
I don't want to quote cuz it looks messy lol. However, @ Crow: I'm not saying that they automatically have to go with one another. I never said that there was some unspoken rule they had to go hand in hand. I'm just saying, when I see both in a form that's so extreme in a game/movie/etc I'm not offended or shocked by one more than the other. I was just curious as to how people could be more offended by one than the other, never stating that they must be together at the same time all the time.
Again, I don't think anyone here is offended. We are on a Mortal Kombat website and I highly doubt anyone is offended by breasts or ass. This argument is mostly an argument about character design. Just because there is a lot of gore in the game doesn't mean the characters can't be designed a little more seriously. Jill Valentine doesn't run around killing zombies in a bikini.
Cyborg •11/25/2010 04:48 PM (UTC) •
0
I've posted my opinion on when they dress their women up purely for sex appeal, and throwing all character backstory and logic out the window, so I am not gonna go on another rant...
But I DO think if they are gonna take that approach, and show thongs, have no bras, little to no clothing, and have high heels on etc. Sonya should be the ONE person that doesn't follow this trend. Even though others such as Kitana shouldn't be dressed that way either, Sonya is the biggest example of someone who would not, should not, and makes zero sense to have her tits hanging out etc. It just destroys her character and everything she is supposed to be about. I would expect such character treatment from another studio, but you would think NetherRealm would be a bit more protective and logical about their characters.
If this is the case, and they have no apparent value in keeping their characters consistent and sticking to their individual traits that set them apart... why not put Scorpion dressed in rainbows, give Sub-Zero fire, and make Jax white?
It's stupid to contradict everything that makes your characters what they are. They'd rather have Sonya be another run of the mill, dime a dozen, slutty dressed blonde, than actually have a female lead with an actual unique personality in that she's not trying to be pretty or cute...she's just trying to defend her world and takes shit from noone.
Oh well...
But I DO think if they are gonna take that approach, and show thongs, have no bras, little to no clothing, and have high heels on etc. Sonya should be the ONE person that doesn't follow this trend. Even though others such as Kitana shouldn't be dressed that way either, Sonya is the biggest example of someone who would not, should not, and makes zero sense to have her tits hanging out etc. It just destroys her character and everything she is supposed to be about. I would expect such character treatment from another studio, but you would think NetherRealm would be a bit more protective and logical about their characters.
If this is the case, and they have no apparent value in keeping their characters consistent and sticking to their individual traits that set them apart... why not put Scorpion dressed in rainbows, give Sub-Zero fire, and make Jax white?
It's stupid to contradict everything that makes your characters what they are. They'd rather have Sonya be another run of the mill, dime a dozen, slutty dressed blonde, than actually have a female lead with an actual unique personality in that she's not trying to be pretty or cute...she's just trying to defend her world and takes shit from noone.
Oh well...
~Crow~ Wrote:Just because there is a lot of gore in the game doesn't mean the characters can't be designed a little more seriously. Jill Valentine doesn't run around killing zombies in a bikini.
You're right, she fights flesh-eating zombies dressed like this:
And Ada Wong fights zombies dressed like this:
And Sheva has a costume where she fights zombies that looks like this:
Highly practical for the situation...
JADEdSCORPION •11/25/2010 04:50 PM (UTC) •
0
Well, actually in almost all of the Resident Evil games you can have an altenrate where the chick is basically butt naked. Sheva can fight in a Tribal outfit showing both her buttcheeks, serious boobage and a clubbin outfit where I swore I saw clit. Regardless, I get where you're coming from. Was just a question!
It's stupid to contradict everything that makes your characters what they are. They'd rather have Sonya be another run of the mill, dime a dozen, slutty dressed blonde, than actually have a female lead with an actual unique personality in that she's not trying to be pretty or cute...she's just trying to defend her world and takes shit from noone.
Oh well...
Oh well...
You describe Sonya as something she never was.
Garlador Wrote:
You're right, she fights flesh-eating zombies dressed like this:
And Ada Wong fights zombies dressed like this:
Highly practical for the situation...
~Crow~ Wrote:Just because there is a lot of gore in the game doesn't mean the characters can't be designed a little more seriously. Jill Valentine doesn't run around killing zombies in a bikini.
You're right, she fights flesh-eating zombies dressed like this:
And Ada Wong fights zombies dressed like this:
Highly practical for the situation...
It is, given the game's storyline, so again you're making a bad point. In RE1 Jill was in uniform because the game's storyline called for it. In RE3 the city has been overrun and Jill is in a more casual attire. Sonya should be in uniform storyline wise for this game because she is tracking a federal fugitive and ends up in Outworld.
Alts don't count, also. They're alts for a reason.
JADEdSCORPION •11/25/2010 05:00 PM (UTC) •
0
~Crow~ Wrote:
It is, given the game's storyline, so again you're making a bad point. In RE1 Jill was in uniform because the game's storyline called for it. In RE3 the city has been overrun and Jill is in a more casual attire. Sonya should be in uniform storyline wise for this game because she is tracking a federal fugitive and ends up in Outworld.
Alts don't count, also. They're alts for a reason.
Garlador Wrote:
You're right, she fights flesh-eating zombies dressed like this:
And Ada Wong fights zombies dressed like this:
Highly practical for the situation...
~Crow~ Wrote:Just because there is a lot of gore in the game doesn't mean the characters can't be designed a little more seriously. Jill Valentine doesn't run around killing zombies in a bikini.
You're right, she fights flesh-eating zombies dressed like this:
And Ada Wong fights zombies dressed like this:
Highly practical for the situation...
It is, given the game's storyline, so again you're making a bad point. In RE1 Jill was in uniform because the game's storyline called for it. In RE3 the city has been overrun and Jill is in a more casual attire. Sonya should be in uniform storyline wise for this game because she is tracking a federal fugitive and ends up in Outworld.
Alts don't count, also. They're alts for a reason.
LOL I'll just let it go. I don't think there's going to be a point where I can agree with you on this one, Crow! Mei guanxi (Chinese for nevermind, I try and use it everywhere now so I don't get rusty. )
~Crow~ Wrote:
It is, given the game's storyline, so again you're making a bad point. In RE1 Jill was in uniform because the game's storyline called for it. In RE3 the city has been overrun and Jill is in a more casual attire. Sonya should be in uniform storyline wise for this game because she is tracking a federal fugitive and ends up in Outworld.
Alts don't count, also. They're alts for a reason.
It is, given the game's storyline, so again you're making a bad point. In RE1 Jill was in uniform because the game's storyline called for it. In RE3 the city has been overrun and Jill is in a more casual attire. Sonya should be in uniform storyline wise for this game because she is tracking a federal fugitive and ends up in Outworld.
Alts don't count, also. They're alts for a reason.
That's a terrible excuse. After going through the ordeal in RE1, wouldn't Jill be MORE likely to dress UP when the zombie invasion flares up? I mean, she's wearing a long-sleeve shirt AROUND HER WAIST! ANYTHING is better than nothing to protect your delicious flesh from zombie bites. And ANYTHING is more practical to run around in than a miniskirt. She obviously has jeans or pants.
And whose to say Sonya doesn't strip down after starting the tournament? Look at the movie; does she end up fighting in all the military gear she starts off with? No, she fights in something more casual; short shorts and a wife-beater. Nothing about that really screams "military" to me.
And alts ALWAYS count if the fans make them count. Again, Kitana and Sub-Zero's alts in MK:DA were vastly preferred to their main outfits, enough so that they became their primaries in MK: Armageddon. And Scorpion's Deception alt was just a perfect recreation of his MK3 and MK4 uniform, which also became his primary in Armageddon. Don't be so quick to cast aside an alt costume. If Sonya gets an alt that fixes ALL your problems, you can just pick that instead, right?
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.