I'd love to see Sumie Sakai in TNA. Anywho, download is slow, it's late,time for bed. Later peeps.

Ah, great that Christian won the title. Angle vs Christian will defenetely be better then Angle vs Abyss or Angle vs Sting.

I agree. And Angle is going to destroy Christian and there will be a new champion

Yup, and I stand by that statement until one of these "Indie" feds can step up and prove me wrong!




HA! Says you! She's way more talented than Gail Kim! IMO




Oh I agree, but they need to bring in female "wrestlers". More like Gail Kim and Jacky. Instead of Tracie and Christie, which are both only good at looking pretty and have NO wrestling ability. Especially Christie, which is why I had to laugh at her promo last night! She was trying to put herself in the same category as Lita and Chyna, which she can't, cause she can't wrestle her way out of a wet sack!

TNA PPV's are so much better than WWE's of late.

MKgeek why do you defend WWE so much, i prefer it myself but even have to admit that its going downhill.

I've heard that Shelton Benjamin was a jobber
Bret Hart not a legend
Batista the wrestler of the year

but now, the grandaddy of 'em all has arrived! It's the pinnacle, the mount everest, of stupid shit!

TheMkGeek says that Jacky has more talent than Gail Kim.


HOLY SHIT! HOLY SHIT! HOLY SHIT!

Traci Brooks can wrestle. She's wrestled in independents for years.

TheMkGeek makes judgment without knowing what he's talking about?

NO WAY!

You know I have no access to Indie stuff at all, so I only base it on what I see on tv. I've yet to see her wrestle so when I see her wrestle, then I might change my opinion. As for what I said about Jacky I stand by it. She had more success than Gail Kim in the WWE. If I could get access to their Indy stuff than maybe I might change my mind about them.

Just like I changed my mind about Bret Hart. Zent, if you look back, I believe in and earlier post, I change my opinion and said that Bret was a Legend. As soon as he got inducted into the HOF, and I watched his dvd, I changed my opinion of him.

Now I feel that I don't have to deffend my rational and irrational opinions to anyone so I'm done.

Wow, that's a bold statement! TNA's ppvs have been nothing but the same matches over and over again! WWE at least gives a little, very little, variety.

And as for why I defend the WWE and why I'm such a hardass fanboy, is because there's simply nothing better than the WWE! The Indy feds and TNA have light years to go before they offer me and true wrestling fans, anything better than the WWE, and yes, I admit to that the WWE is going downhill, slightly more and more, but until something else comes along...well, I'm a WWE Fanboy 4 Life!

WWE is boring, please explain how it is good. Without Triple H all WWE is, is Shawn Michaels and Edge for actual superstars in high card postiions.

The only reason i ever watch is to lok at all those fine ladies.

"HA! Says you! She's way more talented than Gail Kim! IMO"

and that really shows what you know when it somes to wrestling: nothing.

oops! did i just say wrestling? i ment "sports entertainment"

I think you'll find that most TRUE wrestling like hum...WRESTLING.

Raw started off quite well this week.

Estrada through a table...nice to watch.

we all know mkgeek has no idea wat hes saying and if he does... hes totally retarted IMO


Nice TNA ppv i liked it. I think VKM is taking this thing to far but we all know whos involved... RUSSO

who do u guys think will win the Royal rumble?

One of the hardy boyz you just watch and wait

nice raw this week.

i marked out majorly for the handicapped match....the FIRST shawn micheals match i've enjoyed since his summerslam return a few years back. a little bit of that old intensity that i've seen as lost for the past few years was there tonight and it rocked.


and apparently it's still batista/taker, title vs undefeated streak, as a possible main event for wrestlemania and i'm still nervous about it. i swear that if they let batista go over taker and end this streak i will officially denounce the wwe and personally embark on a pilgrimage(sp) to stamford to piss on wwe's world headquaters. i don't want the streak ended period, but if it had to end, batista does not deserve(in this life or the next) to be the one that ends it.

I think if they do Undertaker/Batista at Wrestlemania Taker will win. Supposedly Taker's looking to retire soon. I imagine they'll give him one last title run before he does. I've heard he's very protective of his Wrestlemania streak. I think he also said in an interview that if anyone ends his streak, he wants it to be Kane.

i hope kane ends his streak too, but batista? come on.

Kane cant be the one to end Taker's streak. Maybe ten years ago, but not now, he's too down on the card. To say Kane is on the same card level as Undertaker would be laughably wrong.

Oh and TheMkGeek, you're right, you don't have access (or rather, you dont try to get access) to all the indy stuff, etc, etc, but then just shut your mouth and instead of saying that Jacky is far better than Gail Kim, say ''I havent really seen most of Gail's work, so I cant really tell, but I like Jacky better''. That way, you dont sound like an idiot.

And both are better than Triple H, so now RAW is little better for me... except for the atrocious Trump-Rosie segment, did that was stopping seeing WWE for now...

MkGeek, I don't disagree with you on a lot of thing, but the whole "WWE is better than TNA" thing has got to stop. You support WWE because of the talent, when most of their good talent has quit, they fired them, or they jumped to....TNA! The only reason WWE overshadows TNA right now is because Vinnie Mac is flowing billions of dollars into his product, while Dixie Carter and TNA are working in the low millions. I know as soon as TNA overtakes WWE as the premier wrestling promotion in the country (yes, i said wrestling, not sports-entertainment), you're gonna jump on the TNA bandwagon, instead of those of us that have been there since day one.

Now, onto your claim about the forthcoming women's division in TNA: The women of TNA can actually wrestle, plus they can be eye candy as well. Gail Kim, two-time women's champion in WWE, Jacquline (sp?), multi-time womens champ, Traci Brooks, never afraid to step in the ring, and mix it up with the guys..Christy Hemme, who is getting better, in-ring wise. I heard she's been doing some pretty intense training as of late, so it will be interesting to see how that turns out. The only two women i could not see in the division right now are SoCal Val and jackie Gayda, only because they need more in-ring time...but it's going to be interesting this year to see how TNA takes the women's division... EDIT: o, and if you want to find good indy stuff...youtube or google video. They got a three part of CM Punk vs. Samoa Joe there. good shat :D

Yeah, I admit that I am too lazy to try to get access to Indy stuff, simply cause I don't care about the Indies...there I said it! Just cause someone might have been good in the "Indies" doesn't neccessarily still make them good when they get onto televised wrestling. So I'll say ''I havent really seen most of Gail's work, so I cant really tell, but I like Jacky better" imo! And as for TRUE wrestling fans, they don't watch it solely based on the wrestling alone, they watch it for the entertainment as well. Hell, if wrestling and wrestlers were judged solely based on wrestling ability alone, wrestling as a whole would be in worse shape then it is now, imo.

And I was going to go on a long rant to defend myself, but I thought I'd get carple-tunnel-syndrome, so I'll just say this:

Everyone here is entitled to their own opinions, myself included, regardless of how rediciulous their opinions might seem. This is a "DISCUSSION" Thread with the emphasis on Discussion. Let's try to keep it civil, and keep the childish name calling off the board. Anyone who thinks they're clever calling me names, comes across as nothing more than a jackass and a bigger idiot than I am! And Zent, as much as we disagree, I like to agree to disagree with you cause you show me the respect that I deserve, unlike some of the others here, and I thank you for that, and that is why you're one of the few I respect here. So if you don't like what I say that's fine, but please try to show me and others some respect.


Moving on: After last night's RAW telecast here is a full list of updated competitors for the Royal Rumble:

Raw
Viscera
Shelton Benjamin
Johnny Nitro
Jeff Hardy
Chris Masters
Kenny Dykstra
Ric Flair
Carlito
Shawn Michaels
Edge
Randy Orton

Smackdown
Chris Benoit
MVP
Matt Hardy
Mike the Miz
Chavo Guerrero
Finlay
The Undertaker
Kane
King Booker

ECW
CM Punk
Sabu
Sandman
Rob Van Dam
Bob Holly

How do you know these things, its magical.

Anyway, personaly that has to be the worst Rumble roster of all time.

Shawn michaels is the only person there id like to see win.

Other than that without some veterains and fan favorites in there,,,,,thats just a worthless match up, i doubt it will be enjoyable.

Your sarcasm aside, I find my news online. And here's more news:

** Major star to debut/join ECW tonight on Sci-Fi, Global for Canadian viewers Friday **