I really can't stand him. He's just too obnoxious. Way worse than most the guys from IGN.

Yea he is absolutely horrible at reviewing things. Ridiculously obnoxious and normally has no clue what he is talking about. Being loud and yelling in an attempt to be funny is what he does so good for him I guess. Oh well.

I respect the guy (and find him entertaining), but he tends to nit-pick A LOT. Makes me a tad nervous, I'll admit, but I haven't always seen eye-to-eye with him before so I'm not too concerned.

As someone who's seen what he's complaining about in full, I had no major issues with it. Just small things. Compared to my gripes with MK9, that's a major improvement.

He's upset the story ends too early and is short, which is understandable, cus its true.

If anything him being upset it ended means the story in good till the end


I like angry joe, but he can be entertaining, but he's not the best reveiwer

this. Joe is a bit of a casual with MK though, he was calling Shinnok "Shinn-ook" and stuff like that, so I wouldn't take his review too seriously.

I've stopped listening to him. Last review of his I skimmed over was Battlefield Hardline where he called the game generic and said he wanted tanks, heavy assault vehicles and jets like BF4.

I usually like his reviews so we will see, and unless NRS ends the game like The Sopranos I cant see it being that bad (Don't tell me how it ends btw lol)

I like joe. He's passionate about his shit and he appeals to casual fans. I don't watch him regularly by any means, but I'm usually okay with his thoughts and opinions

I can't stand him, he seems fake as shit. A lot of his opinions are exaggerated to the point of being stupid. I wouldn't use him for an objective view on anything. That being said, if people like him and he can support himself youtube then I say good for him. I'm not a hater, I'm a realist.

I like Joe, but if he gives this game below a 8 i am just fucking done

I don't mind Joe. Just a passionate gamer.

Not EVERYONE is gonna give MKX flying colors. There are some of us VERY passionate about the story and a 4 hour story mode is going to be disappointing to a lot of gamers.

ya i miss konquest mode, it could of been its own game

story mode style (mk9, MKX) blows, unless it was way longer, then it could be cool

or maybe like having to still walk form places to activate the cut scenes(or is that konquest mode again XD)

they need a rpg single player(possibly co-op) then their always bad ass fighting game, would be the best MK

You know Joe and his thoughts on 4 hour(or less) video games

ya i really hope he reviews more than the story, and u have to wait awhile before that for a fighting game like MKX,

otherwise your only reveiwing a tiny bit, and can't give a fair assesment

there really should be no final reveiws, till after the online faction /realm invasions

Who the hell is Angry Joe? Why should I care?

I feel like people shouldn't wait on people to review games. Faceless reviews of something that don't give any of the writer's personality or anything too much into it are probably the best.

I know why people use them, but I always thought people took reviews too seriously and should just make up their own opinions on something.

Mad Mavado

Maybe it's like Deception where the fate of the story mode is left up to the tower endings?

Das a gud one.

Annoyed Ashrah

Rambo: the video game reveiw

4 hour story?

That's huge for a fighting game. If people were expecting 9-11 hour campaigns like The Last of Us or The Order: 1886 then yeah, I guess they'll be disappointed.

Best review of MKX was fatal 8.