MK Trilogy 3 (Are You All Happy Now?)
Mortal Kombat X
Pages: 1
MK Trilogy 3 (Are You All Happy Now?)
0
posted08/16/2008 11:12 PM (UTC)byPapaRoachFanCome on guys, they should quickly put every single character from MK1, MK2, MK3, UMK3, MKT, MKM and any other 2d game i didn't mention and put them all in one game.
You can either play as MK1 Liu Kang, Or MK2 Liu Kang or MK3 Liu Kang.
You can choose to play as Classic Sub Zero from MK1, UMK3 or MKM.
And also, make online play for it!
Release it on all 3 home consoles.
You can either play as MK1 Liu Kang, Or MK2 Liu Kang or MK3 Liu Kang.
You can choose to play as Classic Sub Zero from MK1, UMK3 or MKM.
And also, make online play for it!
Release it on all 3 home consoles.
outworld222 •07/13/2008 02:12 AM (UTC) •
0
Ok good idea, but there are so many ideas on the boards right now, Boon can't listen to them all at once, see what I mean?
insidious_t •07/13/2008 02:42 AM (UTC) •
About Me
"I will not hide my tastes or aversions...If you are true, but not in the same truth with me, cleave to your companions; I will seek my own." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
0
be a great idea, but i think armageddon counted as mk trilogy 2.
outworld222 •07/13/2008 03:28 AM (UTC) •
0
insidious_t Wrote:
be a great idea, but i think armageddon counted as mk trilogy 2.
be a great idea, but i think armageddon counted as mk trilogy 2.
But I understand what he means. He means....like....orgainize all the Sub-zeros and all the Lui Kangs etc next to each other. And make the game online!!!!! BECAUSE ONLINE RULES!!!!
skorptile •07/13/2008 05:55 AM (UTC) •
0
MKP ring any bells? It had everyone from everything plus more. If only it was for consoles...
Deathbearer •07/13/2008 06:20 AM (UTC) •
0
I consider MK Trilogy 2 to be Armageddon.
Separate characters from every iteration of the game? No, just no...
The balance would be fucked over royally. And MK needs balance in gameplay above such trivial desires as ninjas/characters from every game. Most of them should be killed off instantly anyway.
The balance would be fucked over royally. And MK needs balance in gameplay above such trivial desires as ninjas/characters from every game. Most of them should be killed off instantly anyway.
ShaoKahnsBoyfriend •07/14/2008 07:12 PM (UTC) •
0
Chrome Wrote:
Separate characters from every iteration of the game? No, just no...
The balance would be fucked over royally. And MK needs balance in gameplay above such trivial desires as ninjas/characters from every game. Most of them should be killed off instantly anyway.
Separate characters from every iteration of the game? No, just no...
The balance would be fucked over royally. And MK needs balance in gameplay above such trivial desires as ninjas/characters from every game. Most of them should be killed off instantly anyway.
if they did it right then it may work...kinda like how Capcom did that version of Street Fighter 2 with different incantations of every character. Meaning the game in the end would ultimately use the umk3 engine but the mk2 characters would either not have dial-a combos. But I don't think that is what is stopping them from doing it. I think it's because they can't use the actors from the previous games in a new game. I think some of the actors from mk1 and mk2 tried to get royalties for the home versions and future releases.
PapaRoachFan •07/15/2008 12:39 AM (UTC) •
About Me
Herro.
0
T-rex Wrote:
Go play Armageddon.
/thread.
Go play Armageddon.
/thread.
this thread has nothing to day with armagedon, its concerning ideas for a new MK Trilogy game.
i don't appreciate your rudeness
Deathbearer •07/15/2008 12:43 AM (UTC) •
0
why bother putting different versions of the characters? not to be mean but that's almost as stupid as MK vs DC. It makes less sense than Armageddon did.
PapaRoachFan •07/15/2008 12:48 AM (UTC) •
About Me
Herro.
0
Deathbearer Wrote:
why bother putting different versions of the characters? not to be mean but that's almost as stupid as MK vs DC. It makes less sense than Armageddon did.
why bother putting different versions of the characters? not to be mean but that's almost as stupid as MK vs DC. It makes less sense than Armageddon did.
Some people may like the MK2 version of Scorpion better than MK1 and MK3!
Deathbearer •07/15/2008 01:52 AM (UTC) •
0
PapaRoachFan Wrote:
Some people may like the MK2 version of Scorpion better than MK1 and MK3!
Deathbearer Wrote:
why bother putting different versions of the characters? not to be mean but that's almost as stupid as MK vs DC. It makes less sense than Armageddon did.
why bother putting different versions of the characters? not to be mean but that's almost as stupid as MK vs DC. It makes less sense than Armageddon did.
Some people may like the MK2 version of Scorpion better than MK1 and MK3!
They can be alternates instead of having a different version of the same character.
PapaRoachFan •07/15/2008 02:01 AM (UTC) •
About Me
Herro.
0
What im thinking of is something like dbz budakai tenkiachi.
Were you select the character then choose which version you want.
Were you select the character then choose which version you want.
Deathbearer •07/15/2008 02:04 AM (UTC) •
0
Don't like DBZ so I don't know what you're talking about, but I'll take your word for it I guess.
LycaniLLusion •07/18/2008 08:21 AM (UTC) •
About Me
0
if there was another trilogy game there would have to be alot of characters from mk mythologies,special forces,all the konquest games,maybe some of the characters be made from lesser enemies from the adventure games like for instance the red dragon clan mutant dragonmen or the oroichi beasts...however its spelled. it would kinda be cool for a game like this to come out but i wouldnt expect a story line for it. an idea to take the place of storyline...instead of revealing an ending at the end of the game they could reveal the history of that character. i would also make a game like this on next gen consoles so it could handle the amount of characters.
i do understand what people are saying about it but yet i dont care. armagedon i thought was a great game and i look at is as armagedon and not as trilogy 2. so,if done the right way and with the right graphics i think another trilogy could be an epic win.
i do understand what people are saying about it but yet i dont care. armagedon i thought was a great game and i look at is as armagedon and not as trilogy 2. so,if done the right way and with the right graphics i think another trilogy could be an epic win.
PapaRoachFan •07/20/2008 08:41 PM (UTC) •
About Me
Herro.
0
i dont think the konquest and special forces characters could work, they are 3d models while the other games use sprites. wouldnt work.
insidious_t •08/15/2008 04:11 AM (UTC) •
About Me
"I will not hide my tastes or aversions...If you are true, but not in the same truth with me, cleave to your companions; I will seek my own." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
0
how could there be a third trilogy when we're technically only on game 8?
PapaRoachFan •08/16/2008 03:06 AM (UTC) •
About Me
Herro.
0
insidious_t Wrote:
how could there be a third trilogy when we're technically only on game 8?
how could there be a third trilogy when we're technically only on game 8?
everyone was bitching that MK Armageddon was MK Trilogy 2, so I changed it so they would shut up!
insidious_t •08/16/2008 11:12 PM (UTC) •
About Me
"I will not hide my tastes or aversions...If you are true, but not in the same truth with me, cleave to your companions; I will seek my own." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
0
i'm aware of that. i just thought your new thread title was funny due to the endless complaints.
Pages: 1
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.