Does anybody else feel like Tanya and Rain were supposed to be on the main roster?
0
posted04/17/2015 06:03 AM (UTC)by
Avatar
Sindel798
Avatar
Member Since
12/02/2014 04:45 AM (UTC)
I feel like they were originally planned to be on the main roster. They both have redesigns and are fightable. They are also Mileenas only allies while Kotal has 5.

I feel like they were scrapped so the whiny Kitana and Liu Kang fans could have their characters.
Sindel798 Wrote:
I feel like they were originally planned to be on the main roster. They both have redesigns and are fightable. They are also Mileenas only allies while Kotal has 5.

I feel like they were scrapped so the whiny Kitana and Liu Kang fans could have their characters.

No.
Whiny Kitana and Liu fans? I feel like they'd have just gone back and played them in previous games. I still do that along with the new releases.
Avatar
Thatoneguy
04/16/2015 10:11 PM (UTC)
0
I can't say who deserves the spot for sure, but in my opinion Liu Kang was a waste of a roster spot.
Avatar
Sindel798
04/16/2015 10:13 PM (UTC)
0
Thatoneguy Wrote:
I can't say who deserves the spot for sure, but in my opinion Liu Kang was a waste of a roster spot.


The only reason Liu, Kitana and Kung Lao are in is because they are popular. They are pointless in the story. -comin from a Kitana fan.
Avatar
Manneen
04/16/2015 10:16 PM (UTC)
0
They were indeed wastes of roster spots, but I think NRS intended them to be in the roster the entire time. NRS to me was afraid to not include them amid fear of backlash from the fans.
Nobody "deserves" a roster spot. If your favorites happen to get in the game, then cool. If not, it sucks, but better luck next time, or go back and enjoy the games they've been in along with the new one.

I guess I'm lucky in that I'm a fan of 95% of the characters in the series and generally play the whole roster in fighting games.
Avatar
daryui
Avatar
About Me
04/16/2015 10:23 PM (UTC)
0
No.

@Nsayeed @domcianciolo @K0MB4T @Jontology Therea39;s definitely no truth to the theory that some chars were unfinished and became NPCs...

— Brian Chard (@bcharred) April 14, 2015
ript async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8">ript>
Avatar
SpellcraftQuill
04/16/2015 10:30 PM (UTC)
0
Popularity although it is because of popularity that they'd make better DLC, these two along with Fujin should have replaced these three and then the two Shaolin should have been DLC later on with Kitana taking Tanya's DLC spot.
Avatar
KenshiMaster16
04/16/2015 10:30 PM (UTC)
0
daryui Wrote:
No.

@Nsayeed @domcianciolo @K0MB4T @Jontology Therea39;s definitely no truth to the theory that some chars were unfinished and became NPCs...

— Brian Chard (@bcharred) April 14, 2015
ript async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8">ript>


Yep, pretty much. They were there for cameos sake. Although, knowing what we know now and having played the game, the 4 NPC fights should've been on roster, imo.
Avatar
Blade4693
04/16/2015 10:48 PM (UTC)
0
They probably should have, but what you gonna do?
Avatar
oracle
Avatar
About Me

-sig by MINION

04/16/2015 11:04 PM (UTC)
0
Sindel798 Wrote:
The only reason Liu, Kitana and Kung Lao are in is because they are popular. They are pointless in the story. -comin from a Kitana fan.
I mean yeah with Tanya's vital and irreplaceable role that only she could've filled. People keep mentioning Kitana and Liu Kang specifically like they stole a spot. Absolutely not. Story doesn't dictate who is playable, if it did we would have Kano, Goro, Ferra/Torr etc etc.
Blade4693 Wrote:
They probably should have, but what you gonna do?


Complain until they are.
Avatar
JAX007
Avatar
About Me

04/17/2015 12:00 AM (UTC)
0
So minor npc characters who aren't playable should have been playable...Yet those who are playable with minor roles should have been npcs?

Make up your mind people.
Avatar
ScorpionEater12
Avatar
About Me

As Mr. Sloan always says, there is no "I" in team, but there is an "I" in pie. And there's an "I" in meat pie. Anagram of meat is team... I don't know what he's talking about.

04/17/2015 12:27 AM (UTC)
0
Sindel798 Wrote:
I feel like they were originally planned to be on the main roster. They both have redesigns and are fightable. They are also Mileenas only allies while Kotal has 5.

I feel like they were scrapped so the whiny Kitana and Liu Kang fans could have their characters.


To be fair, there are just as many, if not more "whiny" Rain fans than there are Kitana and Liu Kang fans.
Avatar
Zidane_FF
04/17/2015 12:28 AM (UTC)
0
I also think that those two should be in the roster. Why all the work to give Rain a redesign just to make a cameo?

Also, why Tanya does not show any variations? She will have those special moves when released?
Avatar
lanoitarnu
Avatar
About Me

What

04/17/2015 12:54 AM (UTC)
0
Zidane_FF Wrote:
I also think that those two should be in the roster. Why all the work to give Rain a redesign just to make a cameo?

Also, why Tanya does not show any variations? She will have those special moves when released?


Rains has more of a part in the story than someone like Kitana idk why he isn't on the roster. Tanya probably wasn't planned for dlc until near the end of development.
Avatar
oracle
Avatar
About Me

-sig by MINION

04/17/2015 01:01 AM (UTC)
0
lanoitarnu Wrote:
Rains has more of a part in the story than someone like Kitana idk why he isn't on the roster.
But he doesn't thoughconfused
Avatar
Maria_Linda
04/17/2015 01:03 AM (UTC)
0
Tanya and Rain are klearly being saved for MK11... now that everyone else is a carbonized revenant.

Tanya had amazing appearances in MKX, I am happy with MKX just the way it is. It's perfect. Liu Kang and Kitana are epik.

And MK11 will obviously be epik as well.
Avatar
residentfan
04/17/2015 01:06 AM (UTC)
0
Isn't Rain the one who stole the smulet and gave it to Mileena? If that's true he is already one of the most important characters in the Story.
Avatar
KenshiMaster16
04/17/2015 01:13 AM (UTC)
0
JAX007 Wrote:
So minor npc characters who aren't playable should have been playable...Yet those who are playable with minor roles should have been npcs?

Make up your mind people.


Yeah I don't understand that mindset either. They all should've been playable and we could've gotten an MK9 sized roster again. 4 more wouldn't have been too much of a hassle, I'm sure.
Avatar
lanoitarnu
Avatar
About Me

What

04/17/2015 01:19 AM (UTC)
0
oracle Wrote:
lanoitarnu Wrote:
Rains has more of a part in the story than someone like Kitana idk why he isn't on the roster.
But he doesn't thoughconfused


Kitana does literally nothing in the story (which I hate). Rain has a bigger role than her and I think you actually fight him more than Kitana also.
Avatar
oracle
Avatar
About Me

-sig by MINION

04/17/2015 01:35 AM (UTC)
0
lanoitarnu Wrote:
Kitana does literally nothing in the story (which I hate). Rain has a bigger role than her and I think you actually fight him more than Kitana also.
You fight them both twice. His role is actually very similar to Kitana, Liu Kang, and Kung Lao. They are of comparable rolls with maybe Liu Kang's being a bit more important because of Raiden.
Avatar
Jenafella56
04/17/2015 04:53 AM (UTC)
0
Well that's true fans were upset because Liu and Kitana were killed and wanted them back. Me being a Kitana fan (no pun intended) I was hurt too, but I didn't expect her to come back in MK X, I was happy yeah but wasn't expected her. I expected Rain to be part of the roster and not DLC since he is so popular
Avatar
nightbreed_16
Avatar
About Me

I will rock you.

04/17/2015 04:59 AM (UTC)
0
The only character that we all know was originally going to make the roster was Baraka and we all know he may very well be DLC.grin
Pages: 2
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.