Attention: Nobody in MKXs development team has given a number for the roster without DLC.
0
posted09/03/2014 01:54 AM (UTC)by
Avatar
Kaber
Avatar
Member Since
06/21/2014 08:44 PM (UTC)
Stop pretending otherwise.
Avatar
mkmileena
Avatar
About Me

Ethereal, ravenous, piercing. It's Mileena bitch.

Lovely signature by MINION

09/01/2014 09:55 PM (UTC)
0
um. oh. kay.
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
09/01/2014 09:55 PM (UTC)
0
Do you have any proof to back up this statement of yours?
Avatar
mkmileena
Avatar
About Me

Ethereal, ravenous, piercing. It's Mileena bitch.

Lovely signature by MINION

09/01/2014 09:59 PM (UTC)
0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Do you have any proof to back up this statement of yours?


no :(
Avatar
Wanderer
09/01/2014 10:00 PM (UTC)
0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Do you have any proof to back up this statement of yours?


That's not how burden of proof works. If no one has made such a statement, his assertion would be correct, so it would require the opposing party to provide proof that such a statement was made. In this case the lack of a statement is his proof.
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
09/01/2014 10:02 PM (UTC)
0
Wanderer Wrote:
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Do you have any proof to back up this statement of yours?


That's not how burden of proof works. If no one has made such a statement, his assertion would be correct, so it would require the opposing party to provide proof that such a statement was made. In this case the lack of a statement is his proof.


Sshh sshh sshh... sleep now.
Avatar
RedSumac
09/01/2014 10:07 PM (UTC)
0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Do you have any proof to back up this statement of yours?

Do you?
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
09/01/2014 10:12 PM (UTC)
0
RedSumac Wrote:
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Do you have any proof to back up this statement of yours?

Do you?


I didn't make a statement. But when I do, I will have the proof to follow it up. That is if it is a factual statement.
Avatar
KungLaodoesntsuck
09/01/2014 10:18 PM (UTC)
0
I know.

People have this idea that 28 is the final roster count. Ed said similar. SIMILAR. Which means it could be more than 28 or less than 28 as well. That's why I hate all this "wasted roster space" talk.
Avatar
Icebaby
09/01/2014 10:19 PM (UTC)
0
KungLaodoesntsuck Wrote:
I know.

People have this idea that 28 is the final roster count. Ed said similar. SIMILAR. Which means it could be more than 28 or less than 28 as well. That's why I hate all this "wasted roster space" talk.


Haven't you learned that a lot of people here (and possibly other sites) don't understand the meaning behind the word "Similar?"
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
09/01/2014 10:22 PM (UTC)
0
Just in case, here's the Google definition of the word:

similar
ˈsɪmɪlə

adjective

1.
having a resemblance in appearance, character, or quantity, without being identical.
"a soft cheese similar to Brie"
synonyms: alike, (much) the same, indistinguishable, close, near, almost identical, homogeneous, interchangeable; More
antonyms: dissimilar, different, dissimilar to, unlike

GEOMETRY
(of geometrical figures) having the same shape, with the same angles and proportions, though of different sizes.

noun
noun: similar; plural noun: similars

1.
archaic
a person or thing similar to another.
"he was one of those whose similar you never meet"

2.
a substance that produces effects resembling the symptoms of particular diseases (the basis of homeopathic treatment).
"the principle of treatment by similars"
Avatar
Tazer_Gunshot
09/01/2014 10:29 PM (UTC)
0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Just in case, here's the Google definition of the word:

similar
ˈsɪmɪlə

adjective

1.
having a resemblance in appearance, character, or quantity, without being identical.
"a soft cheese similar to Brie"
synonyms: alike, (much) the same, indistinguishable, close, near, almost identical, homogeneous, interchangeable; More
antonyms: dissimilar, different, dissimilar to, unlike

GEOMETRY
(of geometrical figures) having the same shape, with the same angles and proportions, though of different sizes.

noun
noun: similar; plural noun: similars

1.
archaic
a person or thing similar to another.
"he was one of those whose similar you never meet"

2.
a substance that produces effects resembling the symptoms of particular diseases (the basis of homeopathic treatment).
"the principle of treatment by similars"


English class in progress grin lol
Avatar
Charybdis
Avatar
About Me

"Pray for the Kahn's Mercy"

09/01/2014 10:35 PM (UTC)
0
Wanderer Wrote:
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Do you have any proof to back up this statement of yours?


That's not how burden of proof works. If no one has made such a statement, his assertion would be correct, so it would require the opposing party to provide proof that such a statement was made. In this case the lack of a statement is his proof.


To be fair, this isn't a court of criminal law. It's a fucking video games forum
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
09/01/2014 10:38 PM (UTC)
0
Well, it's the same with this Johnny "confirmation".

Adam Urbano never confirmed him as a playable character. He was asked if we would see Johnny fight Cassie, and he said yes. That's not the same as saying Johnny is a playable character. But that doesn't prevent people on here to take it as a confirmation.

But people don't care about that. They just hear what they want to hear.
Avatar
KungLaodoesntsuck
09/01/2014 11:03 PM (UTC)
0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Well, it's the same with this Johnny "confirmation".

Adam Urbano never confirmed him as a playable character. He was asked if we would see Johnny fight Cassie, and he said yes. That's not the same as saying Johnny is a playable character. But that doesn't prevent people on here to take it as a confirmation.

But people don't care about that. They just hear what they want to hear.


That's not what was said.

Danny asked "Can we fight her as Johnny Cage?" (Her being Cassie Cage) And Urbano says "Yeah you can". There's only one way to take that since:

A. They won't make Johnny a Cassie skin

B. They wouldn't make Johnny playable just for Story mode and not the rest of the game
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
09/01/2014 11:09 PM (UTC)
0
KungLaodoesntsuck Wrote:
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Well, it's the same with this Johnny "confirmation".

Adam Urbano never confirmed him as a playable character. He was asked if we would see Johnny fight Cassie, and he said yes. That's not the same as saying Johnny is a playable character. But that doesn't prevent people on here to take it as a confirmation.

But people don't care about that. They just hear what they want to hear.


That's not what was said.

Danny asked "Can we fight her as Johnny Cage?" (Her being Cassie Cage) And Urbano says "Yeah you can". There's only one way to take that since:

A. They won't make Johnny a Cassie skin

B. They wouldn't make Johnny playable just for Story mode and not the rest of the game


Ah, then I misheard. Thanks for clearing that up. ^^
Edit: Yeah, just saw the video again, and you are absolutely right.
Oh well...
Avatar
RedSumac
09/01/2014 11:51 PM (UTC)
0
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
RedSumac Wrote:
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Do you have any proof to back up this statement of yours?

Do you?


I didn't make a statement. But when I do, I will have the proof to follow it up. That is if it is a factual statement.

His statement is a fact, since it's common knowledge that as of now
Nobody in MKXs development team has given a number for the roster without DLC.

But of course, arguing for the sake of the arguing is an interesting hobby. grin
Avatar
Uppercut Editions
Avatar
About Me

Uppercut Editions - Mortal Kombat Encyclopedia Project Creator and Manager - Join Our Fight and Like the Mortal Kombat Encyclopedia Project on Facebook and Twitter -

09/02/2014 12:06 AM (UTC)
0
Ed has said it's comparable to what MK9 shipped with, which is more than 24. Now, that may include "Unlockables", so that would sit it at 28, then you'd have a guest or two, to bring it to 30. DLC would bring it to 34-36, so yeah, that makes sense.

I still want someone to ask specifically..."Will the game ship with more than 24 characters?", they always add the DLC in that question and it throws an immediate wrench in there.
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
09/02/2014 12:08 AM (UTC)
0
RedSumac Wrote:
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
RedSumac Wrote:
Jaded-Raven Wrote:
Do you have any proof to back up this statement of yours?

Do you?


I didn't make a statement. But when I do, I will have the proof to follow it up. That is if it is a factual statement.

His statement is a fact, since it's common knowledge that as of now
Nobody in MKXs development team has given a number for the roster without DLC.

But of course, arguing for the sake of the arguing is an interesting hobby. grin


You asked a question, I answered. No arguements there.
Wouldn't it be scary if the roster was aiming for Tekken Tag 2's roster size?
Avatar
Jaded-Raven
09/02/2014 01:34 AM (UTC)
0
Ion3008 Wrote:
Wouldn't it be scary if the roster was aiming for Tekken Tag 2's roster size?


Well, I hope for another character clash game, but I doubt it will be MKX. Maybe the next game, which per tradition would be the time to do so.

Here's what I mean:
- MK1
- MK2
- MK3
- MK Trilogy = clash game.

- MK4
- MKDA
- MKD
- MK Armageddon = clash game

- MKvsDCU (considered to be the 8th game in the series)
- MK9
- MKX
- Next clash game
Avatar
QueenAhnka
Avatar
About Me

Rebel. Outsider. Fan Of The Obscure. Politically Incorrect. Spitfire!

09/02/2014 12:48 PM (UTC)
0
I'm believe 24 characters tops unless they add spaces on the select screen. Until then I'm expecting 23 characters with one guest.
Avatar
thisiscourage
09/02/2014 01:01 PM (UTC)
0
There have been comments by boon saying a roster about the size of mk9. It is ok to speculate, 90% of this forum is for speculation. The other 10% is when news finally drops.

No, you know what? Lets shut it down, come on everyone get out of here. The OP doesnt want any more speculation; see ya when some more news drops. Thanks OP for clearing all this up for us.
Avatar
KungLaodoesntsuck
09/02/2014 01:14 PM (UTC)
0
Ion3008 Wrote:
Wouldn't it be scary if the roster was aiming for Tekken Tag 2's roster size?


I'd love another MKA as long as it played like MK9 and MKX. The tough part would be the balancing. But in any case I wouldn't expect another game like that for a long time.
Avatar
Zebron
Avatar
About Me
"Not the first to say it in this thread, but when Bo Rai Cho is the high point of the new character selection, they did something really wrong." -Gillbob316
09/02/2014 02:21 PM (UTC)
0
Ion3008 Wrote:
Wouldn't it be scary if the roster was aiming for Tekken Tag 2's roster size?


Yes, it would be scary, because Armageddon showed that the MK team doesn't handle a roster of that size well.
Pages: 2
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.