

About Me
Shao Kahn did nothing wrong
0
Quanchi9 Wrote:
Definitely not.
[Killswitch] Wrote:
Maybe next year, Baraka. Maybe next year.
Maybe next year, Baraka. Maybe next year.
Definitely not.
Rude
About Me
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
0
oracle Wrote:
She's always going to be a quarter final queen.
AgentK Wrote:
Maybe next year Kitana, maybe next year.
Maybe next year Kitana, maybe next year.
She's always going to be a quarter final queen.
This'll be an interesting one to revisit in the next few years.

0
Definitely never, Tanya. Definitely never. 


About Me
0
phishstix17 Wrote:
Definitely never, Tanya. Definitely never.
Definitely never, Tanya. Definitely never.
The fact that being absent for years made her go further in the competition...


About Me

0
saibot forever fujin never
saibot forever fujin never
saibot forever fujin never

0
Did she? I thought she was knocked out first round, like usual? Maybe she made it to the second round once, but I don't have a good memory of these things. No respect for my girl! She was everything I wanted in MKX :)
About Me
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
0
phishstix17 Wrote:
Did she? I thought she was knocked out first round, like usual? Maybe she made it to the second round once, but I don't have a good memory of these things.
Did she? I thought she was knocked out first round, like usual? Maybe she made it to the second round once, but I don't have a good memory of these things.
Tanya made the second round in 2014 and 2015.
diirecthit Wrote:
The fact that being absent for years made her go further in the competition...
The fact that being absent for years made her go further in the competition...
She improved when she became more relevant. That is logical and appropriate.


About Me
0
Mick-Lucifer Wrote:
Tanya made the second round in 2014 and 2015.
She improved when she became more relevant. That is logical and appropriate.
phishstix17 Wrote:
Did she? I thought she was knocked out first round, like usual? Maybe she made it to the second round once, but I don't have a good memory of these things.
Did she? I thought she was knocked out first round, like usual? Maybe she made it to the second round once, but I don't have a good memory of these things.
Tanya made the second round in 2014 and 2015.
diirecthit Wrote:
The fact that being absent for years made her go further in the competition...
The fact that being absent for years made her go further in the competition...
She improved when she became more relevant. That is logical and appropriate.
How was she more relevant in 2014 and 2015 (before she was released) than in 2016?
About Me
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
0
diirecthit Wrote:
How was she more relevant in 2014 and 2015 (before she was released) than in 2016?
How was she more relevant in 2014 and 2015 (before she was released) than in 2016?
MKX was announced in 2014. Fans who played MK2011 were given a lot of reason to be thinking about Tanya and the MK4 characters. In 2015, she was known to be in the game. That is an increased peak of relevance. Fin.


About Me
0
Mick-Lucifer Wrote:
MKX was announced in 2014. Fans who played MK2011 were given a lot of reason to be thinking about Tanya and the MK4 characters. In 2015, she was known to be in the game. That is an increased peak of relevance. Fin.
diirecthit Wrote:
How was she more relevant in 2014 and 2015 (before she was released) than in 2016?
How was she more relevant in 2014 and 2015 (before she was released) than in 2016?
MKX was announced in 2014. Fans who played MK2011 were given a lot of reason to be thinking about Tanya and the MK4 characters. In 2015, she was known to be in the game. That is an increased peak of relevance. Fin.
Being playable will always be more relevant than just being talked about becase said character isn't in the game, what you're saying doesn't make sense. Sorry.
About Me
What do you like? Hit the Toasty thumbs up on articles and forum posts for a quick response!
0
diirecthit Wrote:
Being playable will always be more relevant than just being talked about becase said character isn't in the game, what you're saying doesn't make sense. Sorry.
Being playable will always be more relevant than just being talked about becase said character isn't in the game, what you're saying doesn't make sense. Sorry.
You'll get there eventually and we'll all be cheering you on. Yay!
I'm really not interested in measuring 2016 against other years (which seems to be where you're getting stuck). In simplest terms: 2014 was a peak speculation year with high reasonable focus on MK4. For Tanya, that was inevitably a relevance high point.


About Me

0
Mick-Lucifer Wrote:
You'll get there eventually and we'll all be cheering you on. Yay!
diirecthit Wrote:
Being playable will always be more relevant than just being talked about becase said character isn't in the game, what you're saying doesn't make sense. Sorry.
Being playable will always be more relevant than just being talked about becase said character isn't in the game, what you're saying doesn't make sense. Sorry.
You'll get there eventually and we'll all be cheering you on. Yay!
this discussion is going nowhere, and the tournament is over. sorry, guys.
Thread Closed.
EDIT: Apparently I have no power so carry on
© 1998-2025 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.