If MK9 is 2D
0
posted10/29/2009 07:47 AM (UTC)by
Avatar
cotyh09
Avatar
Member Since
04/17/2008 01:30 AM (UTC)
Do you think they will use real people like the classics?

Fatalities could be so insane..... just imagine Sub-Zero performing his spine rip. When the head starts to rip you actually see fake flesh stretching and tearing. I really hope they make this game sick. So sick it's disgusting
Avatar
DemolitionMann7
09/25/2009 05:47 AM (UTC)
0
dude if its 2d i really doubt they will do the same as the old mks and use real people. Most likely they will do something similar to sf4 graphic wise.
Avatar
Icebaby
09/25/2009 01:31 PM (UTC)
0
cotyh09 Wrote:
Do you think they will use real people like the classics?

Fatalities could be so insane..... just imagine Sub-Zero performing his spine rip. When the head starts to rip you actually see fake flesh stretching and tearing. I really hope they make this game sick. So sick it's disgusting


The only people they are using for the game are the motion capturers. Mainly Daniel Pesina. Other than that, Mortal Kombat will not be using live action characters for their next game.

Besides, there hasn't been a live-action game in years. Basically, since the 90s unless I'm wrong. But with the technology we're using today, why go back to those old roots?
Avatar
cotyh09
09/25/2009 01:37 PM (UTC)
0
That kinda sux. I just was thinking how gorey the game could be with real actors. Fatalities would look so real but maby a little disturbing at the same time
Avatar
Adam Ronin
09/26/2009 12:32 AM (UTC)
0
The fatalities would look the same as they did in 1993 if they used real people.
Avatar
mkpunk55
Avatar
About Me

I keep coming back to mortal kombat, like an abused spouse to an alcoholic. Maybe one day the series will sober up...

09/27/2009 03:54 PM (UTC)
0
It would not look the same as it did in 1993. The animation would be extremely fluid and they wouldn't have to compress the models to fit in 16 bits or 32 bits. I don't know how you could even think that.....
Avatar
mkdfan
Avatar
About Me
09/29/2009 06:34 PM (UTC)
0
I would hate it if MK9 was 2D, everyone would be like,
"Oh MK copying SF again? Quel Surprise".

and we dont want that. we want,
"Wow MK has done something new and original, Awesome!"

If it was a new HD 2D arcade game then that would be fine. I wont pay 40/50 quid for 2D.
Avatar
fedegita
09/29/2009 09:41 PM (UTC)
0
mkdfan Wrote:
"MK has done something new and original!"


Oxymoron?
Avatar
DemolitionMann7
10/03/2009 07:42 PM (UTC)
0
mkpunk55 Wrote:
It would not look the same as it did in 1993. The animation would be extremely fluid and they wouldn't have to compress the models to fit in 16 bits or 32 bits. I don't know how you could even think that.....


I was thinking the same thing...
Avatar
LycaniLLusion
10/06/2009 03:56 AM (UTC)
0
It really is not a big deal with dimensions when it comes to character models IMO. It matters more with the backgrounds and surroundings of the fighting area.
Ok....try to imagine it similar to the MK: Shaolin Monks versus system with the newer tech of the ps3 and 360.
This example some might think is a bad one but its the only game that fits with my thoughts...DragonballZ....the sandbox style arenas in DBZ are a bit large for MK standards but they have 3 dimensions....the destructable stuff is also 3d. The characters are pretty much 2 dimentions(cell shaded)....now change the art from cartoon to realism action and there is what I am getting at. It will not look like it did back in the 90's...not at all. Especially in HD.
Avatar
RazorsEdge701
10/06/2009 05:18 AM (UTC)
0
LycaniLLusion Wrote:
The characters are pretty much 2 dimentions(cell shaded)....now change the art from cartoon to realism action and there is what I am getting at. It will not look like it did back in the 90's...not at all. Especially in HD.


It's not actually possible to make a cel-shaded character not look like a cartoon. Cel-shading is basically just taking a 3D model and adding very simply drawn, cartoony textures and lighting techniques to it.
Avatar
LycaniLLusion
10/06/2009 01:36 PM (UTC)
0
@RazorsEdge701...Wow your right about the cell shaded characters. I could have sworn it was 2d. My bad....dunno where my head is at lol. I should have just kept going with the MK:SM explanation but I am sure that you get what I am saying. The thing is with this style the arena can not revolve around the characters...the characters would revolve around the arena. Otherwise it would be like paper Mario characters lol. If they went this route it would also even give them tons of extra room on disc for other modes and what not. In any case...the rumor of MK9 being 2d is more than likely not true anyway.
Avatar
June0082
10/08/2009 01:16 PM (UTC)
0
i don;t think that it will be 2d that is so dated and classy. why is it that there competing against Street Fighters, Mortal Kombat topped that game for years i mean it took a long time for that game to come out with a new one it has been beaten and i thinlk Midway should stick with the 3d, i mean they can make it god of war gory,
Avatar
Mostly_Harmless
10/08/2009 09:43 PM (UTC)
0
Do you guys even realize how much the 3D mortal kombats have sucked so much? The last and best mortal kombat was UMK3. I would have said trilogy but the game is imbalanced because of broken combos. The best 3D mortal kombat was mortal kombat 4 for dreamcast, and that is because it played like the 2d ones. Over at gamerfaqs it states that mk 9 will be 2d, but I highly doubt that. after mortal kombat 4, the gameplay got super slow and the speed of the fighting seemed boring to me. The only complaint I had against UMK3 was that the fighters seemed too animated compared to mk1 and 2, and the fatalities didn't seem to be taken seriously. What would I like to see? I would love to see the real life actors like mk 1, only much more animations and better graphics/resolution, while keeping the same pace for speed of the gameplay and similar combo ideas from umk3. I thought the fatalties from umk3 sucked except for sub zeros freeze and rip a part one. New and improved fatalties is something I'd like to see as well.
Avatar
cotyh09
10/09/2009 12:54 AM (UTC)
0
If they make it completely 2D it would be a step down because we would lose the side stepping and 360 visual of the stages.

I think the punches should be fast like the 2D games. If you saw the making of MK4 you know that the punches are slower because you see the full swing of a punch instead of a fist cocked back to in your face instantly.
Avatar
BIG_SYKE19
10/09/2009 06:04 PM (UTC)
0
Yeah make it 2d again!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHH!!!!!!!!!!!! make it like street fighter iv, i dont hear no one saying thats outdated.
Avatar
lordyeroc
10/29/2009 05:48 AM (UTC)
0
for the old comforting feel you know? the same reason i still listen to cassettes
Avatar
Gho$t
10/29/2009 07:47 AM (UTC)
0
Mortal Kombat is known for keeping it's classic qualities, but I highly doubt they are willing to take a step back like that. For a new game in tis era? No.
Pages: 1
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.