How do you feel about variations and the future?
0
posted02/12/2015 06:25 AM (UTC)by
Avatar
Sindel798
Avatar
Member Since
12/02/2014 04:45 AM (UTC)
Do you think variations will continue? I an not sure how I feel about them. I kinda feel like they are pointless and should just have one big moveset. If each variation is like a different style and there are 26 of them, thats 78 fighting styles. For MK11, would you rather them have a big roster or keep the variations? So far, i would personally go for the larger roster.
Avatar
oracle
Avatar
About Me

-sig by MINION

02/10/2015 03:32 PM (UTC)
0
It depends. I wonder if they do cone back will returning characters have the same variations.
Avatar
Aquarius_D
02/10/2015 04:36 PM (UTC)
0
oracle Wrote:
It depends. I wonder if they do cone back will returning characters have the same variations.


hmmm...gonna be awkward for Jade now...however Jade did use Kitana's fans back in MK2wink

However if Mileena dies, in MK11 Kitana will get a Joyful variation whereby she uses Mileena's Sai's and some mk fans will dig it. grin
Avatar
Icebaby
02/10/2015 04:42 PM (UTC)
0
I'll wait to play the game first before having any saying about the future.
Avatar
Blade4693
02/10/2015 04:59 PM (UTC)
0
Yeah im going to have to play the game for a while before I decide which I prefer.
Avatar
KungLaodoesntsuck
02/10/2015 05:15 PM (UTC)
0
It's hard to say going forward. I think if people latch on to the idea like they did for X-Rays they very well could return. But at the same time, I think these variations were created as a direct response to being different from MK9. So I'm not sure I see them drastically overhauling variations for each game.
Avatar
WeaponTheory
Avatar
About Me

"BEER ME!" - Noob Saibot

02/10/2015 06:32 PM (UTC)
0
An interesting but pointless concept because Tiers is a thing.
Almost makes me feel sorry for the company, but this is what happens when you create a Fighting game that purposely forces people to counter-pick. Which no one likes.
All that hard work making three unique styles for characters that will get neglected in competitive play once people find the dominate character.
All that hard work making three unique fighting styles will eventually be for nothing once people find the dominate Variation on each character.
And at the same time of these character development efforts, they're trying so hard to make sure characters have 3 variations while unfortunately showing a bit lack of thought process to their concept. From the means of sampling other characters, to the means of having a Variation that just do ONE thing. But god damn I give them serious props for trying, I can only imagine this being a very tiring idea to pull off.

That is how I feel about the Variation concept.

I doubt we will see this concept again in the future.
Avatar
moneyguy
02/10/2015 07:49 PM (UTC)
0
In my opinion the idea is pointless. I understand the idea of switching things up, but why do I want (approx.) 33% Scorpion.

I don't need to play the game to know I would prefer a bigger roster. In my head the game is more enjoyable when you play with characters you like. Jade was never top tier, but I found her play style very unique and fun. Every character shouldn't have a 'range mode' or 'defense mode' they should just have a play style that a player needs to understand and adapt to.


This is coming especially after seeing that last variation of Ermac's.
Avatar
unleash_your_tounge
Avatar
About Me

"Life, for all it's anguish, is ours Miss Ives. It belongs to no other." - Ferdinand Lyle

02/10/2015 08:03 PM (UTC)
0
I'm still not 100% sold on the variation gimmick.

But I'm not so much doubtful as I am anxious.

However I am doubtful of variations making a comeback in MK11.....but we'll see.
Avatar
Blade4693
02/10/2015 08:47 PM (UTC)
0
Even though im not a tournament player and there are sure to be some weak links, im hoping NRS can balance them enough to where the majority of people online aren't only playing the same 4 or 5 characters/variations after the lists come out lol

I wont really mind if that happens since it usually does, but a game that balanced would be amazing.

Avatar
petrcech
02/10/2015 10:14 PM (UTC)
0
Icebaby Wrote:
I'll wait to play the game first before having any saying about the future.
Avatar
moneyguy
02/11/2015 04:00 AM (UTC)
0
petrcech Wrote:
Icebaby Wrote:
I'll wait to play the game first before having any saying about the future.


What is the point of this response?
Avatar
SHAMEonNINJAS
02/11/2015 04:15 AM (UTC)
0
I like the idea. It kinda feels like they are pulling a lot from the 3d era with this stuff and pulling a redux. Kamidogu realms and 3 fighting styles each. I never really liked switching styles during combat, I never used Bo's sumo. Before is better. I also like how they are character based, not based on real martial arts. For some like kung Lao it's cool because he's Flashy Shaolin. Or Bo Drunken Fist. The balancing must be a nightmare.
Avatar
DjangoDrag
02/11/2015 06:31 AM (UTC)
0
Variations over roster size. Any day. Variations are something that can make MK very unique to other fighting games moving forward. A large roster with 25+% shit characters is useless to a good game. 20 characters that all have viable and diverse gameplay options is fantastic.

Imagine MK as a board game of Monopoly where each piece (car, dog, thimble, etc.) has its own gameplay perks. What use is three extra choices if they have no value compared to the other pieces? Thats what needs to be considered here.

-My opinion
Avatar
Bugsy2188
02/11/2015 08:03 AM (UTC)
0
I think 2 variations would've made balancing easier. Also can you imagine the PITA if each variation is involved with each character mastery?
Avatar
TemperaryUserName
Avatar
About Me
New sig on the way
02/11/2015 08:51 AM (UTC)
0
moneyguy Wrote:
In my opinion the idea is pointless. I understand the idea of switching things up, but why do I want (approx.) 33% Scorpion.

You're not going to get 33% Scorpion. You're getting 3 full 100% Scorpions.

Variations are brilliant because you can now choose your favorite character without being locked into a style. If we combined variations, we'd have a roster full of complete characters that are impossible to balance unless:

A) they sterilize certain specials to the point of uselessness (EX: Sub's ice puddle), or...

B) make every character flooded with options and therefore having no stylistic identity. You'd also have a pile of broken characters like the world has never seen.

Making every character broken may seem like a viable approach for balancing, but historically, it has NEVER worked.
Avatar
DjangoDrag
02/11/2015 11:33 AM (UTC)
0
TemperaryUserName Wrote:
moneyguy Wrote:
In my opinion the idea is pointless. I understand the idea of switching things up, but why do I want (approx.) 33% Scorpion.

You're not going to get 33% Scorpion. You're getting 3 full 100% Scorpions.


The truest shit. Shit's true.
Avatar
Tazer_Gunshot
02/11/2015 02:34 PM (UTC)
0
Rather we just have straight up normal move-sets or the variation system, it doesn't change MK. MK will always be MK. So pretty much, whatever the future holds I'll be ok with.
Avatar
nightbreed_16
Avatar
About Me

I will rock you.

02/11/2015 02:35 PM (UTC)
0
I don't hate the variation system so I wouldn't mind it returning for MKXI.wink
Avatar
JadedReign
02/11/2015 06:03 PM (UTC)
0
WeaponTheory Wrote:
An interesting but pointless concept because Tiers is a thing.
Almost makes me feel sorry for the company, but this is what happens when you create a Fighting game that purposely forces people to counter-pick. Which no one likes.
All that hard work making three unique styles for characters that will get neglected in competitive play once people find the dominate character.
All that hard work making three unique fighting styles will eventually be for nothing once people find the dominate Variation on each character.
And at the same time of these character development efforts, they're trying so hard to make sure characters have 3 variations while unfortunately showing a bit lack of thought process to their concept. From the means of sampling other characters, to the means of having a Variation that just do ONE thing. But god damn I give them serious props for trying, I can only imagine this being a very tiring idea to pull off.

That is how I feel about the Variation concept.

I doubt we will see this concept again in the future.


Pretty much. Can't wait to start battling the same character/variation online all the time after EVO!

But that actually works for a player like me who generally gravitates toward picking up and playing with underused characters (and probably their least used variation in this game). Rarely seen online generally means your prey opponent doesn't know your full potential. Player ignorance is one hell of a weapon. grin
Avatar
Lord_Greyjoy
02/11/2015 06:08 PM (UTC)
0
I'll reply to you the same way I did on Gamefaqs:

The variations have nothing to do with roster size. If they did, we wouldn't get a roster size similar to MK9 like we're getting; we'd be getting 15-20 fighters tops. I doubt they add any significant development time to a character. Variations just take away/add 1-3 specials and sometimes change/add a couple normals. Characters remain 90% the same across their variations in terms of moveset. You're mostly looking at play style changes, really. So taking away variations wouldn't blow up the roster either.

That said, whether variations continue or not depends on their success, and we need to see how things hold up months, maybe a year, after the game releases to be sure of that.
Avatar
FerraTorr
Avatar
About Me


Props to MINION for making this sig.

02/11/2015 06:16 PM (UTC)
0
Yeah I've been wondering how they will build off of it and deal with it in future games. I have no idea honestly.
Avatar
Dervis
02/11/2015 06:40 PM (UTC)
0
I think its all going to depend on how well they're implemented in this game. They could be really cool, and offer three distinct play styles for each character, or they could all be ultimately meaningless and superficial. Are the three variations really going to be THAT distinct from one another? Will one be so superior to the others that they'll never be used? I have a number of concerns about this new gimmick, but I don't think we'll know until we've had time to play around with them all.

Personally, I think it's an interesting dimension to the fighting genre, and I hope they'll pursue it again in the future.
Avatar
Denizen
Avatar
About Me

02/11/2015 07:34 PM (UTC)
0
Im afraid it might be too gimmicky, which is a shame. I guess we will have to see how it fares with the fans and competitive players.
Avatar
khanswarrior15
02/11/2015 08:33 PM (UTC)
0
I quite like the whole variation system.

People are already complaining that there will be one definitive variation for each character in regards to a tier list, but I tend to play lower tiers anyway - far more rewarding.

I think people are making the variations out to be this super dynamic game changer, when characters are going to have their normal base specials and target combos (with the exception of mournful Kitana, Lackey Torr, Ninjitsu Scorpion, and whichever Sub uses ice weapons.)

I feel like they will play fairly similar around the board, just with variations to further capitalize on a specific aspect of their metagame.
Pages: 2
Discord
Twitch
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
Privacy Policy
© 1998-2024 Shadow Knight Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Mortal Kombat, the dragon logo and all character names are trademarks and copyright of Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.