Distorted anatomy aside (his right bicep seems to be mating with the trapezius, heh)- the accented, sharp lines look great- pull together the form well. I like the facemask for some reason. No offense, but I can't help but think all these MK original fighters all look like MK 'ninja' rippoffs in standard/ trite poses :/

Its neat.
You should seriously consider making a pic with realistic proportions, or at least attempt to.

why do i have 0 dragons i dont get it whats wrong with this artwork

Sorry, I don't 'grade' art- if that's what you are getting at 8P

what do you mean with 8 p

its a smilee face :P

ooh oke hydro

....Riiiiight.

karim Wrote: why do i have 0 dragons i dont get it whats wrong with this artwork

From what I've seen and heard, there's a bunch of people out here that got bored with this style, and others never liked it to begin with.
Personally I think you've been doing quite interesting things, and I can't say I haven't seen worse material (even in museums)... On the other hand you might want to try another style, another medium, etc.
This way you can keep it interesting for yourself (as a learning process) and for others (it might even keep you from getting those louzy zero dragon ratings).

My 2 cents...

-Acj

well i gave ut 3 dragon logoz cause i dont like the brush effect but the body is done well.

This guy is screwed in a fight man. He got no legs and a fucked up face......geez.

i couldt finish his legs

does anybody know much about photoshop

I know that it wasn't made for ppl like u.

eeh zentile your beggining to anoying me

Children, children...

"what do you mean with 8 p"
--
Ya, I know, What I posted before didn't make sense with what your were refering to, Karim. I still didn't understand the scoring/submission system then, so you can just excuse what I said there.

Anyhow, it seems like your letting this whole rating system get to ya. Seriously man, don't worry so much about what score other patrons may give- what should be more valuable is the advice/comments you uphold and how you can see your own improving.
Heh, mention 'race' to an antrhopologist, and they'll go crazy on ya with how ineffective quantifying continous variables can be. Same could be said with rating art.
Thus, don't hold such a mere 10 point scale with so much weight. Numbers can only say so much- marking improvement and gage-ing critiques can say textbooks more..

(...I'm doing it again, aren't I?- I mean typing excessively. I really have to stop before my fingertips redden and fall off :p)

TLaG- Wrote: (...I'm doing it again, aren't I?- I mean typing excessively. I really have to stop before my fingertips redden and fall off :p)

I much rather take the time and effort to read a somewhat bigger text of somebody who actually has some valuable things to say than those one-liner posts that say absolutely nothing.

Seriously, hanging around a message forum for years and reading literally thousands of posts like "OMG UR GH3Y FAGET lol" makes you tired.

[/rant]

-Acj